| Entity Name: | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP, PLLC |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: | Florida Limited Liability Co. |
| Status: | Active |
| Date Filed: | 29 Dec 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Last Event: | LC AMENDMENT |
| Event Date Filed: | 10 Aug 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Document Number: | L16000001322 |
| FEI/EIN Number | 26-2477778 |
| Address: | 270 SW Natura Avenue, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL, 33441, US |
| Mail Address: | 270 SW Natura Avenue, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL, 33441, US |
| ZIP code: | 33441 |
| County: | Broward |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Ticktin Peter | Agent | 270 SW Natura Avenue, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL, 33441 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| TICKTIN PETER | ORIG | 270 SW NATURA AVENUE, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL, 33441 |
| Registration Number | Fictitious Name | Status | Filed Date | Expiration Date | Cancellation Date | Mailing Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G16000010516 | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP | EXPIRED | 2016-01-28 | 2021-12-31 | No data | 600 W. HILLSBORO BLVD., SUITE 220, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL, 33441 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED | 2023-04-07 | Ticktin, Peter | No data |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2018-08-10 | No data | No data |
| LC DISSOCIATION MEM | 2018-08-10 | No data | No data |
| CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2016-09-27 | 270 SW Natura Avenue, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441 | No data |
| REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2016-09-27 | 270 SW Natura Avenue, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441 | No data |
| REINSTATEMENT | 2016-09-27 | No data | No data |
| CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2016-09-27 | 270 SW Natura Avenue, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441 | No data |
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2016-09-23 | No data | No data |
| CONVERSION | 2015-12-29 | No data | CORPORATION WAS A CONVERSION RESULT. CONVERTING CORPORATION WAS P08000026085. CONVERSION NUMBER 700000157387 |
| Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENNETH TUCH VS PETER TICKTIN, et al. | 4D2021-2628 | 2021-09-10 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Lawrence Jeff Shapiro |
| Name | Peter David Ticktin |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Michael R. Vater, Juliane Murphy Brumbaugh, Robert M. Klein, Peter David Ticktin, Christopher Luis Melendez |
| Name | Christopher Luis Melendez |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP, P.A. |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Juliane Murphy Brumbaugh |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP, PLLC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Hon. Carol-Lisa Phillips |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Broward |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2023-03-24 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2023-03-24 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| Docket Date | 2023-03-07 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| Description | Order Granting Attorney Fees-Offer Judg. ~ ORDERED that the appellees’ February 10, 2023 motion to consider misfiled motion for appellate attorneys’ fees is granted. Further, ORDERED that the appellees’ motion for attorney’s fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that the appellees are entitled to fees under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2022) and, if so, setting the amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. |
| Docket Date | 2023-02-10 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
| Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO CONSIDER MISFILED MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEYS' FEES |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2023-01-26 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Affirmed |
| Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
| Docket Date | 2022-02-09 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2023-01-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| Description | Deny Attorney's Fees ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 19, 2022 motion for attorney's fees is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2022-11-04 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Dispensing with Oral Argument |
| Description | ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court. |
| Docket Date | 2022-10-07 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Supplemental Record |
| Description | Supplemental Records ~ 75 PAGES |
| On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
| Docket Date | 2022-10-03 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
| Description | Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 21, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within five (5) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-29 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-27 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that the court defers ruling on appellees’ September 2, 2022 motion to strike to the assigned merits panel. |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-21 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Records |
| Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
| Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-15 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response ~ TO APPELLEES' MOTION TO STRIKE |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-02 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Motion To Strike |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-31 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-26 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
| Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
| Description | Request for Oral Argument ~ VIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-26 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that appellant’s reply brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that it exceeds the word count limitations. An amended reply brief in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-19 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
| Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ (Response filed 8/26/22) |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-19 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
| Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
| Description | Request for Oral Argument |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-19 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Appellant's Reply Brief ~ **Stricken** |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-16 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 15, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within seven (7) days from the current due date. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time. |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-15 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-01 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s July 29, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken. |
| Docket Date | 2022-07-29 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-06-30 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee's Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-31 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-31 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 06/30/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-04-28 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 05/31/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-04-28 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-03-28 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-03-07 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the appellant’s March 4, 2022 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed as to appellee Juliane Murphy only. |
| Docket Date | 2022-03-07 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed March 4, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
| Docket Date | 2022-03-04 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
| Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ OF APPELLEE, JULIANE MURPHY, ONLY. |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-03-04 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-02-17 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | Peter David Ticktin |
| Docket Date | 2022-02-14 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s February 9, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
| Docket Date | 2022-02-11 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ OF NON-OBJECTION |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-01-21 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 18, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
| Docket Date | 2022-01-20 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice ~ OF NON-OBJECTION TO SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2022-01-18 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-29 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 19, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-19 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-15 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal |
| Description | Received Records ~ 1,858 PAGES |
| On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-10 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Status Report |
| Description | Status Report ~ SUPPLEMENTAL |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-04 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Status Report |
| Description | Status Report |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File Status Report |
| Description | Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Notice of Non-Receipt of Transcript filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on October 14, 2021, appellant is ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment for and preparation of the record on appeal. |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-14 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Affidavit |
| Description | Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE |
| On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
| Docket Date | 2021-09-22 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
| Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2021-09-13 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
| Docket Date | 2021-09-13 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Docket Date | 2021-09-10 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
| On Behalf Of | Kenneth W. Tuch |
| Docket Date | 2021-09-10 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
| Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County CACE18-015148 |
Parties
| Name | CARR INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC. |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Richard Lee Ruben |
| Name | Michael R. Vater |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP, P.A. |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Jamie Alan Sasson |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP, PLLC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Kendrick Almaguer, Peter David Ticktin, Michael R. Vater, Anthony J. Badway |
| Name | Hon. John B. Bowman |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Broward |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2022-01-21 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Dismissed - Order by Clerk |
| Docket Date | 2022-01-21 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal |
| Description | Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2022-01-21 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | ORD-Grant Voluntary Dismissal (Joint) ~ At the request of the parties, this case is dismissed. |
| Docket Date | 2021-12-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 01/21/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2021-12-22 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | The Ticktin Law Group, PLLC |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 12/212/2021 |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-22 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-05 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing |
| Description | ORD-deny motion to supplement per 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 4, 2021 motion to supplement the record is treated as a motion to supplement the record and request for judicial notice and is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraph 1. |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-04 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Records |
| Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
| Description | Motion To File Supplemental Record |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-11-04 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Supplemental Record |
| Description | Supplemental Records ~ (PROPOSED) |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not text searchable, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains no bookmarks as required by Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-21 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
| Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
| Description | Request for Oral Argument |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-21 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-10-21 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN** |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-07-19 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal |
| Description | Received Records ~ 238 PAGES (PAGES 1-225) |
| On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
| Docket Date | 2021-07-19 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Affidavit |
| Description | Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE |
| On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
| Docket Date | 2021-07-15 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | The Ticktin Law Group, PLLC |
| Docket Date | 2021-07-01 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ TO 10/25/2021 |
| Docket Date | 2021-07-01 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-29 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief ~ **STRICKEN** |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-01 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
| Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-27 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-26 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
| On Behalf Of | Carr Investment Properties, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-26 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
| Docket Date | 2021-06-30 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 29, 2021 notice is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2021-05-27 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
| Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County CACE17015247 (12) |
Parties
| Name | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | THE TICKTIN LAW GROUP, PLLC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | JUILANN MURPHY |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | ROBERT PHANEUF, INC. |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Samuel Korab |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Hon. Keathan B. Frink |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Broward |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2020-04-27 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-04-20 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed-Failure to Comply ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this court’s December 10, 2019, January 16, 2020, January 27, 2020, March 9, 2020, and March 26, 2020 orders.MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur. |
| Docket Date | 2020-04-20 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Dismissed - Order by Judge |
| Docket Date | 2020-04-02 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order |
| Description | Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court’s March 9, 2020 order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-16 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-03-09 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ This court notes that appellant’s January 31, 2020, February 3, 2020, February 4, 2020, and February 18, 2020 miscellaneous pleadings do not comply with this court’s December 10, 2019 or January 27, 2020 orders. However, it appears that the trial court entered a “final order of dismissal” on February 20, 2020 that dismissed the case with prejudice. Therefore, appellant shall file, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the February 20, 2020 order. Once the final order has been filed in this court, the case shall proceed as to that final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110. |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-18 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-04 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-02-03 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-01-31 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| Docket Date | 2020-01-27 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
| Description | Aplnt to Obtain Final Order-Per Dobrick ~ This court notes that appellant’s January 22, 2020 miscellaneous pleadings do not comply with this court’s December 10, 2019 order. Therefore, appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to obtain a final order, which dismisses a complaint or an action, and file a copy in this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l); Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Paulino v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 106 So. 3d 985, 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“On the other hand, it is well-established that an order which merely grants a motion to dismiss, as contrasted with an order dismissing a complaint or an action, is not a final order.”). Once the final order has been filed in this court, the case shall proceed as to that final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110. Further, ORDERED that the trial court is specifically authorized, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(b), upon appropriate application, to enter a final order in these proceedings. |
| Docket Date | 2020-01-22 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ MISCELLANEOUS PLEADINGS IN RESPONSE TO THIS COURT'S 01/16/2020 ORDER |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2020-01-16 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order |
| Description | Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court’s December 10, 2019 order. |
| Docket Date | 2020-01-14 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal |
| Description | Received Records ~ 259 PAGES |
| On Behalf Of | Clerk - Broward |
| Docket Date | 2019-12-18 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous Entry/Document |
| On Behalf Of | Antoine Wesley Clark Jr. |
| Docket Date | 2019-12-10 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Docket Date | 2019-12-10 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File Response re Jurisdiction |
| Description | Aplnt to Obtain Final Order-Per Dobrick ~ It appearing that the order to which the Notice of Appeal is directed is a non-appealable, non-final order, appellant(s) shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to obtain a final order and to file a copy in this court. Failure to do so will result in sua sponte dismissal of the appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l); Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Paulino v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 106 So. 3d 985, 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ("On the other hand, it is well-established that an order which merely grants a motion to dismiss, as contrasted with an order dismissing a complaint or an action, is not a final order."). ORDERED that the trial court is specifically authorized, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(b), upon appropriate application, to enter a final order in these proceedings. |
| Docket Date | 2019-12-09 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
| Docket Date | 2019-12-09 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency |
| Description | Determination of Indigent Status |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-03-05 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-04-07 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-04-26 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-04-26 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2020-05-28 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2019-04-22 |
| LC Amendment | 2018-08-10 |
| CORLCDSMEM | 2018-08-10 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2018-04-27 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2017-04-26 |
Date of last update: 01 Feb 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
