|
341612117
|
0420600
|
2016-07-12
|
10601 GANDY BOULEVARD NORTH, SAINT PETERSBURG, FL, 33702
|
|
| Inspection Type |
FollowUp
|
| Scope |
NoInspection
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-07-12
|
| Case Closed |
2016-07-13
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1119339 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
341193399
|
0420600
|
2016-01-21
|
10601 GANDY BOULEVARD NORTH, SAINT PETERSBURG, FL, 33702
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-01-22
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-03-05
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1137409 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260453 B02 V |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-09 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-06-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: (a) At the job site, an employee was operating a high reach aerial lift had a fullbody harness but no lanyard. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 30 feet as observed on or about 01/21/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 K06 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-03 |
| Current Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-06-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(6): The fall protection plan did not include a written discussion of other measures that will be taken to reduce or eliminate the fall hazard for workers who cannot be provided with protection from the conventional fall protection systems. For example, the employer shall discuss the extent to which scaffolds, ladders, or vehicle mounted work platforms can be used to provide a safer working surface and thereby reduce the hazard of falling. a) At the job site, the fall protection plan did not consider other alternative fall protection systems criteria and practices such as but not limited to the use scissor lifts or booms, bracket scaffolding attached to the inside or outside of the exterior walls, spreader bars attached to roof trusses, work practices (completing truss sections, erecting and sheeting a series of trusses on the ground and then lifting the unit into place with a crane) to minimize the risk of falls while employees were erecting wood trusses and exposed to fall hazard of approximately 40 feet on or about 01/21/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-03 |
| Current Penalty |
5600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5600.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-06-15 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) At the job site, an employee working at a balcony was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 30 feet. Feasible conventional fall protection such as but no limited to guardrails and or personal fall arrest system were not provided as observed on or about 01/21/2016. B) At the job site, employees erecting wood trusses exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet. Feasible conventional fall protection methods such as but no limited to scissor lifts or booms, bracket scaffolding attached to the inside or outside of the exterior walls, spreader bars attached to roof trusses, work practices (completing truss sections, erecting and sheeting a series of trusses on the ground and then lifting the unit into place with a crane) to minimize the risk of falls while employees were erecting wood trusses and exposed to fall hazard of approximately 40 feet on or about were not provided as observed on or about 01/21/2016. The Garcia Builders, LLC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1094309, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 01/06/2016, with respect to a workplace located at Largo Florida. |
|
|
|
341168086
|
0420600
|
2016-01-09
|
2352 BRUCE B DOWNS, WESLEY CHAPEL, FL, 33544
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-01-11
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-10-02
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-05-09 |
| Current Penalty |
6160.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6160.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-06-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) roof - employees were exposed to a fall of 48 feet while installing sheathing a 5.9/12 sloped roof. The employees were not wearing fall protection, on or about 1/8/16. The Garcia Builders, LLC. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1094309, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 01/06/2016, with respect to a workplace located at Largo Florida. |
|
|
|
341042984
|
0419700
|
2015-11-05
|
2172 SW 38TH DRIVE, GAINESVILLE, FL, 32607
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-11-09
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-08-18
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-12-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-02-22 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about November 5, 2015, two employees using Makita circular handsaws to cut framing pieces were not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing themselves to being hit or struck-by flying debris. b. On or about November 5, 2015, three employees using Hitachi NR83A2 pneumatic nail guns to conduct framing operations were not wearing safety glasses, thereby exposing themselves to being hit by nails or flying debris. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260453 B02 V |
| Issuance Date |
2015-12-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-02-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a. On or about November 5, 2015, in a 4 x 4 Skyjack boom lift, an employee performing framing operations was not protected from a 10-foot fall hazard by use of a personal fall arrest system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B02 II |
| Issuance Date |
2015-12-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-02-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
15 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface six feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level where leading edges were under construction, but who was not engaged in the leading edge work, was not protected from falling by a guardrail: a. On or about November 5, 2015, on the top plate of a structure, 15 employees performing framing operations were not protected from a 10-foot fall hazard by use of a guardrail system. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-12-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-02-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
15 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about November 5, 2015, employees performing framing operations were not trained to recognize, control or minimize fall hazards while working from elevation. |
|
|
|
340943091
|
0420600
|
2015-09-24
|
2098 SEMINOLE BLVD. BUILDINGS 5 AND 7, LARGO, FL, 33774
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-09-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-09-03
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1094311 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-11-09 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-11-20 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-01-04 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
8 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. At the job site, employees installing floor trusses on building 5 were exposed to a 31 feet 3 inch (from the edge of the fourth story floor to the ground), and a 10 foot (from the top of the fourth story floor trusses to the third story floor) fall hazards, in that, no type of fall protection was used, on or about 09/24/2015. b. At the job site, employees marking the walls locations on building 7 were exposed to a 31 feet 3 inch (from the edge of the fourth story floor to the ground) fall hazard, in that, no type of fall protection was used, on or about 09/24/2015. |
|
|
