|
DANIEL PANSKY VS VICTORIA PANSKY, THE LAW FIRM OF BARRY S. FRANKLIN & ASSOCIATES, P.A., AND PHILLIPS LANIER
|
4D2019-2179
|
2019-07-11
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Family - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
FMCE12013820
|
Parties
| Name |
DANIEL PANSKY LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Stephen C. Breuer, Emily J. Phillips, Barry S. Franklin
|
|
| Name |
PHILLIPS LANIER, PLLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin and Associates, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Andrea Gundersen
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Granting Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ Upon consideration of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's March 27, 2023 order, the stay entered pursuant to this court's March 31, 2020 order is lifted. Further, Upon consideration of appellant's November 18, 2019 response, it is ORDERED that the July 31, 2019 motion to dismiss, the August 14, 2019 motion to dismiss, the November 12, 2019 motion to dismiss, and the May 2, 2023 motion to dismiss are granted, and this appeal is dismissed as moot. Further, ORDERED that appellee's September 18, 2019 motion for extension of time to file answer brief is denied as moot.KLINGENSMITH, C.J., MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's April 27, 2023 status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file a notice of voluntary dismissal with this court or, if appellant does not intend to voluntarily dismiss this case, appellant shall file a response explaining why he declines to voluntarily dismiss this case.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, regarding the progress being made toward obtaining an order regarding the applicability of the automatic stay.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, regarding the progress being made toward obtaining an order regarding the applicability of the automatic stay.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Deny Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 23, 2023 motion for extension of time is denied as moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
Order on Suggestion of Bankruptcy ~ A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, it is ORDERED that the parties shall, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, request that the United States Bankruptcy Court issue an order stating whether this appeal should be stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) or any other provision of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See, e.g., In re Hill, 364 B.R. 826, 828 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007) (“Comfort orders serve a valuable purpose. The orders are entered primarily for a third party’s benefit, often to help a sister state court attempting to determine whether it can proceed with a pending action, such as a foreclosure.”). Upon the filing of the request in the United States Bankruptcy Court, the parties shall file a notice of compliance with this Court. Further, should the United States Bankruptcy Court enter an order on the parties’ request, the parties shall file a copy of the order with this Court within five (5) days of issuance of that order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, regarding bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-06
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-05
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-06
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
Order Vacated ~ ORDERED that this court's September 20, 2021 order is vacated.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ***VACATED 9/27/21***ORDERED that appellant's September 17, 2021 status report is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the appellees with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the appellees and the address at which they were served. Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the appellees within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ Upon consideration of appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s July 15, 2021 amended response, appellee Phillips Lanier LLC’s July 14, 2021 response and July 16, 2021 response, and appellant Daniel Pansky’s August 4, 2021 reply, it isORDERED that, to the extent appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s July 15, 2021 response is construed as a motion to dismiss appeal, appellee’s motion is denied. Further, ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report within thirty (30) days from the date of this order regarding bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
Reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to reply, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, to appellee, Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s July 15, 2021 amended response.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ "NOTICE OF JOINDER"
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee, The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.'s July 14, 2021 response is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ ***AMENDED***
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ ***STRICKEN 7/15/21***
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees are directed to respond, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s June 28, 2021 status report.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-09-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF COMPLIANCE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-07-02
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
ORD-Case Stayed Pending Bankruptcy ~ A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, and it appearing that no cause exists as to why the entire above-styled appeal should not be stayed by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 362, it is ORDERED that:This appeal is stayed. If the bankruptcy case becomes closed, dismissed, or modified to permit this appeal to proceed, then appellant shall promptly, and in no event later than twenty (20) days after the event has occurred, notify this court in writing that this appeal may proceed.Unless this appeal is voluntarily dismissed, appellant, within ninety (90) days from the date of this order, and then every ninety (90) days thereafter, shall notify this court as to the status of the bankruptcy case.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
Order on Suggestion of Bankruptcy ~ A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, it is ORDERED that all parties shall show cause in writing, if any there be, within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, why the entire above-styled appeal should not be stayed by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 362. If a party believes that no such cause exists, that party need not file a response.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-To File Response ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to respond, within five (5) days from the date of this order, to appellee’s February 19, 2020 status report.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Jurisdiction Relinquished ~ Upon consideration of appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s January 13, 2020 status report, it is ORDERED sua sponte that jurisdiction is relinquished to the circuit court for an additional twenty-five (25) days for the limited purpose of entering an order from the hearing held on October 17, 2019. Appellee, The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., shall file a status report and any orders of the circuit court entered on relinquishment within twenty-five (25) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that this court reserves ruling on appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s July 31, 2019 motion to dismiss appeal, the August 14, 2019 “motion to dismiss appeal and for other relief incident thereto, including sanctions and attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 and § 57.105, Fla. Stat.,” and the September 18, 2019 “motion for extension of time to file answer brief and for ruling on motion to dismiss filed July 29, 2019.” Further, ORDERED that this court reserves ruling on appellee Phillips Lanier’s November 12, 2019 “motion to dismiss appeal and for other relief incident thereto, including sanctions and attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 and § 57.105, Fla. Stat.”
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding relinquishment of jurisdiction.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Jurisdiction Relinquished ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the caption in the above-referenced case is corrected to add Phillips Lanier as an appellee. All future filings shall reflect this change. Further,Upon consideration of appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s November 8, 2019 notice, it is ORDERED sua sponte that jurisdiction is relinquished to the circuit court for twenty-five (25) days for the limited purpose of entering an order from the hearing held on October 17, 2019. Appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A. shall file a status report and any orders of the circuit court entered on relinquishment within twenty-five (25) days from the date of this order. Further,ORDERED that this court reserves ruling on appellee The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s July 31, 2019 motion to dismiss appeal, August 14, 2019 “motion to dismiss appeal and for other relief incident thereto, including sanctions and attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 and § 57.105, Fla. Stat.,” and September 18, 2019 “motion for extension of time to file answer brief and for ruling on motion to dismiss filed July 29, 2019.” Further,ORDERED that this court reserves ruling on appellee Phillips Lanier’s November 12, 2019 “motion to dismiss appeal and for other relief incident thereto, including sanctions and attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 and § 57.105, Fla. Stat.”
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION(S) TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ **AMENDED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Confidential Information Within Court Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF COMPLIANCE
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the appellee is directed to file a status report within five (5) days from the date of this order regarding relinquishment of jurisdiction.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-06
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s November 6, 2019 “Letter to the Judge”.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ "LETTER TO THE JUDGE"
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the caption in the above-referenced case is corrected to add The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., as an appellee. All future filings shall reflect this change. Further,ORDERED sua sponte that jurisdiction is relinquished to the circuit court for twenty-five (25) days for the limited purpose of determining whether appellant has purged the contempt found in the October 26, 2013 order of contempt. Appellee, The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., shall file a status report and any orders of the circuit court entered on relinquishment within twenty-five (25) days from the date of this order. Further,ORDERED that this court reserves ruling on appellee’s, The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., July 31, 2019 motion to dismiss appeal, August 14, 2019 “motion to dismiss appeal and for other relief incident thereto, including sanctions and attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 and § 57.105, Fla. Stat.,” and September 18, 2019 “motion for extension of time to file answer brief and for ruling on motion to dismiss filed July 29, 2019.”
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-18
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ AND FOR RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS FILED JULY 29, 2019
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-06
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-06
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-14
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ AND FOR OTHER RELIEF INCIDENT THERETO, INCLUDING SANCTIONS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO FLA. R. APP. P. 9.140AND §57.105, FLA. STAT.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ The July 19, 2019 motion of Troy W. Klein Esq., counsel for appellant Daniel Pansky, to withdraw as counsel is granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that (1) this appeal is stayed for twenty (20) days from the date of this order so that new counsel, if desired, may be obtained; (2) this stay will be automatically lifted if substitute counsel files a notice of appearance prior to the end of the twenty (20) day abatement period; (3) if no counsel has filed a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days, all filings shall be sent to appellant Daniel Pansky at the address appearing below; Daniel Pansky 400 Sunny Isles BlvdSuite 1718Sunny Isles, FL 33160danielpansky@yahoo.com(4) if substitute counsel does not appear within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, appellant Daniel Pansky is advised that the case will move forward after the abatement period and compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and the rules of this court is required. Failure to comply with the rules may result in dismissal or other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s August 1, 2019 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice to refiling once the stay is lifted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-01
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-31
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-31
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Order denying EOT w/out prejudice 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 29, 2019 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraphs 1 and 2.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-29
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-12
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-11
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
|
|
DANIEL PANSKY VS VICTORIA PANSKY
|
4D2016-1353
|
2016-04-25
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Family - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
FMCE 12-013820 (41/97)
|
Parties
| Name |
DANIEL PANSKY LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Scott James Edwards
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Tim Bailey
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Kathleen S. Phang, Barry S. Franklin, EMILY JOYCE PHILLIPS, KEVIN D. DENNIS, SOPHIE DEMAYO
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2019-03-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-03-01
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-02-13
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Reversed
|
| Description |
Reversed - Authored Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ ORDERED that, having considered appellant's response, appellee's November 21, 2018 motion to supplement the record is denied as moot. The materials at issue were included in the appendix. No record is transmitted in this proceeding. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(d).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-01-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that the appellee's November 16, 2018 motion to strike is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR ATTY. FEES.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee's November 21, 2018 unopposed motion for extension of time is granted. The time for appellee to file a response to appellant's motion for appellate attorney's fees is extended to November 30, 2018.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-21
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ **PROPOSED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-21
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-13
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-13
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ RESPONSE FILED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-24
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-16
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-09-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's September 25, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-09-25
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-08-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's August 20, 2018 motion for extension of time or in the alternative to establish due date to file answer brief is granted. Appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before September 25, 2018. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-08-20
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO ESTABLISH DUE DATE TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Deferring to Merits Panel
|
| Description |
ORD-Deferring to Merits Panel ~ ORDERED that appellee's July 2, 2018 motion to dismiss is deferred and will be considered along with the merits of the appeal. However, the request to supplement the record included in the motion is granted. Appellee is ORDERED to file the supplemental records as a separate PDF file within five (5) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ **DEFERRED TO THE MERITS PANEL** *AND* FOR OTHER RELIEF INCIDENT THERETO.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ AMENDED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not fully text searchable and was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-29
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 23, 2018 agreed motion for extension of time is treated as a motion to stay and is granted. This case is stayed for thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-23
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ **TREATED AS A MOTION TO STAY**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 6, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-06
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 5, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-05
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-02-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order re Stay
|
| Description |
Stay is lifted, case to proceed ~ ORDERED that the stay entered on June 21, 2017 is lifted and the above-styled appeal shall proceed; further,ORDERED that the appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-02-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days fromthe date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ RE: BANKRUPTCY CASE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-07-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF STATUS OF BANKRUPTCY CASE.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-07-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days fromthe date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS STILL PENDING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days fromthe date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that the appellant is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-09-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
ORD-Case Stayed Pending Bankruptcy ~ **STAY LIFTED**A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, and it appearing that no cause exists as to why the entire above-styled appeal should not be stayed by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 362, it is ORDERED that:This appeal is stayed. If the bankruptcy case becomes closed, dismissed, or modified to permit this appeal to proceed, then appellant shall promptly, and in no event later than twenty (20) days after the event has occurred, notify this court in writing that this appeal may proceed.Unless this appeal is voluntarily dismissed, appellant, within ninety (90) days from the date of this order, and then every ninety (90) days thereafter, shall notify this court as to the status of the bankruptcy case.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 5, 2016 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before June 20, 2016. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-05
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-25
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-25
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-02-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Deny Attorney's Fees ~ ORDERED that the appellee, Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.'s October 24, 2018 motion to tax appellate attorneys' fees against appellant, Daniel Pansky's fees is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-16
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike ~ PORTIONS OF APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEFAND PORTIONS OF APPELLANT'S APPENDIX TO REPLY BRIEF ANDFOR SANCTIONS AGAINST APPELLANT'S COUNSEL
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-10-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellee's appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 29, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
|
DANIEL PANSKY VS VICTORIA PANSKY
|
4D2015-3940
|
2015-10-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Family - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
FMCE12013820 (41/97)
|
Parties
| Name |
DANIEL PANSKY LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Troy W. Klein
|
|
| Name |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
SOPHIE DEMAYO, Barry S. Franklin, Jordan Abramowitz
|
|
| Name |
LAW FIRM OF BARRY S. FRANKLIN
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Tim Bailey
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2018-12-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-14
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-28
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part
|
| Description |
Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part - Authored Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Prevailing ~ ORDERED that the appellee, the Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.’s June 7, 2018 motion for attorney's fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellee is the prevailing party and, if so, setting the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including but not limited to preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. FurtherORDERED that the motion for costs filed by Barry S. Franklin is denied without prejudice to seek costs in the trial court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-08-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-09
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 15 DAYS TO 7/17/18
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-07-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ (AMENDED)
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellee's appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, and was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ *AND* COSTS
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-07
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's May 3, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-03
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order re Stay
|
| Description |
Stay is lifted, case to proceed ~ Upon consideration of appellee's April 6, 2018 status report, the bankruptcy stay is lifted and this case shall proceed. If the parties contend that a stay pending the execution of settlement documents is warranted, the parties shall file an appropriate motion to stay.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-06
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 3/29/18
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-02
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 3/01/18
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-26
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH 1/19/18 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-20
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 10/18/17
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-07-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 7/19/17
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-07-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10)days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 4/5/17
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10)days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF COMPLIANCE WITH 12/30/16 ORDER. BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS ARE STILL PENDING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that Barry S. Franklin, Esq. is directed to file a status report within ten (10) days from the date of this order regarding the bankruptcy proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-09-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ RE: BANKRUPTCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
ORD-Case Stayed Pending Bankruptcy ~ A suggestion of bankruptcy having been filed, and it appearing that no cause exists as to why the entire above-styled appeal should not be stayed by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 362, it is ORDERED that:This appeal is stayed. If the bankruptcy case becomes closed, dismissed, or modified to permit this appeal to proceed, then appellee shall promptly, and in no event later than twenty (20) days after the event has occurred, notify this court in writing that this appeal may proceed.Unless this appeal is voluntarily dismissed, appellee, within ninety (90) days from the date of this order, and then every ninety (90) days thereafter, shall notify this court as to the status of the bankruptcy case.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant Rehearing on Interim Order ~ Upon consideration of appellee¿s June 13, 2016 response, it is ORDERED that appellant¿s June 10, 2016 motion for rehearing of order striking initial brief and appendix is granted. This court¿s May 31, 2016 order is vacated and the following order is made in its place: ORDERED that appellee¿s May 11, 2016 motion to strike is denied; further, ORDERED sua sponte that the record on appeal is supplemented to include the August 13, 2015 transcript found in the appendix to appellant¿s initial brief filed on May 9, 2016.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| Description |
Suggestion of Bankruptcy
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-22
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-13
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING/INTERIM ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-10
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ 5/31/16 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Grant Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that appellee's May 11, 2016 motion to strike is granted, and the appellant's initial brief and appendix are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that it includes citations to a document in the appendix that is not part of the record on appeal. An amended brief and appendix in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The time for any responsive briefing shall be tolled until service of this amended brief and appendix.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ TO 06/29/16
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-11
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike ~ INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-09
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ TO INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ Upon consideration of appellee's April 26, 2016 objection, it is ORDERED that appellant's April 25, 2016 motion to supplement the record is denied. The court notes that the initial brief was due on April 21, 2016 and appellant filed the instant motion five (5) days after the deadline. Appellant shall file the initial brief within five (5) days from the date of this order. The filing of additional motions will not toll the time to file the initial brief.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Objection
|
| Description |
Objection ~ TO MOTION TO SUPP. ROA **SEE 5/5/16 ORDER**
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-25
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of the Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A.'s March 31, 2016 objection, it is ORDERED that appellant's March 30, 2016 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ (574 PAGES)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-03-31
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-03-31
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Objection
|
| Description |
Objection ~ TO MOTION FOR EXT. OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-03-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-02-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 9, 2016 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-02-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-01-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Discharging Show Cause ~ ORDERED that upon consideration of appellant's response filed January 5, 2016, this court's December 29, 2015 order to show cause is discharged. Appellant is advised that this court previously indicated in its acknowledgement letter that this case was an appeal of a final order. Accordingly, the initial brief was due 70 days from October 14, 2015, but was not filed, which prompted the issuance of the order to show cause. Appellant shall file the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-01-05
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-12-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before January 8, 2016, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-26
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
|
|
DANIEL PANSKY VS VICTORIA PANSKY
|
4D2015-2933
|
2015-08-03
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Family - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
FMCD12013820 (41/97)
|
Parties
| Name |
DANIEL PANSKY LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Barry S. Franklin
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2015-10-06
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissal ~ Appellant has failed to respond to this court's August 7, 2015 jurisdictional order and the September 2, 2015 order to show cause. Accordingly, it is ORDERED sua sponte that this appeal is dismissed; further, ORDERED that the September 22, 2015 motion for fees filed by appellee, The Law Firm of Barry S. Franklin & Associates, P.A., is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-06
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-22
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
VICTORIA PANSKY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with this court's August 7, 2015 order directing appellant to file statement of the basis of this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If appellant files the jurisdictional statement within the time provided herein, this order will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-08-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court¿s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the appeal, which is being treated as an appeal of an order which essentially denies the appellant's motion to vacate, is timely. Although the appellant appealed the June 10, 2015 order within 30 days of the July 2, 2015 order denying appellant's motion for rehearing, the trial court struck the motion to vacate on the grounds that it was not filed within a reasonable time, and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(5) only provides for review of timely motions for relief from judgment. Further, Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-08-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee - pro se civil appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED, appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee.If appellant has already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, appellant shall file a copy of that order in this court. If appellant does not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believes that he or she is insolvent, appellant shall complete the enclosed application and mail to the Clerk of the Circuit Court within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status, must also be filed with this court. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-08-04
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-08-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Daniel Pansky
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-08-03
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
