Docket Date |
2021-07-09
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-09
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Attorney Fees Granted (OG47) ~ Upon consideration of Appellee’s Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs, it is ordered that said Motion is granted, contingent upon Appellee ultimately prevailing below, and this cause is remanded to the trial court to fix the amount. FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ., concur.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed - Citation
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-04-14
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-04-14
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix ~ APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ NOT CERTIFIED. INCOMPLETE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER (OR999) ~ Appellant's Motions for further extension of time to respond toAppellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal are denied. Appellee's Motions to Dismiss are denied insofar as they seek dismissal of the appeal for failure to file an appendix or a conforming brief. As for Appellant's failure to timely file an initial brief, the Motion to Dismiss is denied, but the Court reserves, for consideration at a later time, any other sanction that may be imposedfor the failure of Appellant's counsel to comply with this Court's Orders and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-25
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR LIMITED 1-DAY ENLARGEMENT OF TIME THROUGH AND INCLUDINGTODAY, MARCH 25, 2021, TO FILE A RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS,WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-25
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion Denied (OD999) ~ Appellee’s Opposition to Appellant’s March 19, 2021, Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss is noted. Upon consideration, Appellant’s “Motion for Limited 1-Day Enlargement of Time Through and Including March 22, 2021, to File a Response to Appellee’s Second Motion to Dismiss, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law” is hereby denied. Appellee’s Motions to Dismiss are denied insofar as the Motions seek dismissal of the appeal for failure to file an appendix or a conforming brief. As for Appellant’s failure to timely file an initial brief, the Motions to Dismiss are denied, but the Court reserves, for consideration at a later time, any other sanction that may be imposed for the failure of Appellant’s counsel to comply with this Court’s Orders and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and MILLER, JJ., concur.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-23
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ Opposition to Appellant's March 19, 2021 Motion for Extensionof Time to Respond to Appellee's Motion to Dismiss.
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR LIMITED 1-DAY ENLARGEMENT OF TIME THROUGH AND INCLUDING MARCH 22, 2021, TO FILE A RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS,WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
Description |
Order Response: Motion (OR23) ~ Appellant is ordered to file a response within five (5) days of the date of this Order to Appellee's Second Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-11
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix ~ APPELLANT'S APPENDIX TOINITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-11
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
Description |
Amended Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-10
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-10
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ APPELLEE'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ Opposition to Appellant's March 9, 2021 Motion for Extensionof Time to File the Initial Brief.
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion Granted (OG999) ~ Appellee’s Opposition to Appellant’s March 9, 2021, Motion for Extension of Time to File the Initial Brief is noted. Appellant’s Motion for Limited 1-Day Enlargement of Time to File the Initial Brief is treated as an untimely motion for extension of time to file the initial brief, and said motion is hereby granted through March 9, 2021. No further extensions of time will be granted. The filing of pendency of any motion or pleading shall not toll or delay this deadline.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER (OR999) ~ Appellant's First Motion for Enlargement of Time to File a Response to Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal is hereby denied. The Court defers ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. Further, the Court notes that Appellant's initial brief in this cause was due on February 12, 2021, and that Appellee's motion seeks dismissal based on, at least in part, Appellant's failure to timely file an initial brief. Given that, as of the date of the filing of its Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, Appellant has failed to file an initial brief, and has further failed to even file a timely motion for extension of time to file its initial brief, there is no basis for providing Appellant additional time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Instead, the Court treats Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss as a motion for an extension of time to file an initial brief, and the motion is granted to and including March 8, 2021. No further extensions of time shall be granted and the filing or pendency of any motion or pleading shall not toll or delay this deadline.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-04
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ FIRST MOTION FOR ENLAREMENT OF TIME TO FILERESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL, etc.,WITHIN 4-DAYS, THROUGH AND INCLUDINGMONDAY, MARCH 8, 2021,WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TOLIFT THE QUALIFIED STAY UNDER RULE 9.130(f) AND FORATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER RULE 9.400I. MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FOR FAILURE TO FILEAN INITIAL BRIEF AND/OR TO LIFT THE QUALIFIEDSTAY UNDER RULE 9.130(f)
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OR INTHE ALTERNATIVE TO LIFT THE QUALIFIED STAY UNDER RULE9.130(f) AND FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER RULE9.400.
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-16
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice
|
Description |
Notice ~ APPELLANT MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLCNOTICE OF FILING CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
On Behalf Of |
MIO GOURMET PRODUCTS, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-15
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
645 W 27, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ CERTIFIED.
|
On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Certificate of Service
|
Description |
Ap/ant Ordered to File Cert. of Serv. (OR50) ~ All pleadings filed in this Court must be served on each party and contain a certificate of service stating the names and addresses of those served. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.420. Within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, counsel for the appellant is directed to file with this Court a certificate of service indicating the addresses of all the parties in this appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|