| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
5A0001 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-01-14 |
| Current Penalty |
3326.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3326.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by fragments of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) plastic pipe in the event the pipe ruptured: a) In the fabrication/production area, PVC plastic piping was used in exposed above ground areas to transport compressed air. This violation was observed on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
2772.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) In the warehouse/production area, employees were not enrolled in a Hearing Conservation Program when exposed to continuous noise levels at 96.10% (89.7 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 440 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 40 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
1663.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1663.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Employees were required to wear a half face respirator without the employer having a written respiratory protection program. This violation was observed on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Employees were required to wear a half face respirator without having a medical evaluation performed. This violation was observed on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Employees were required to wear a half face respirator without having a fit test performed. This violation was observed on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 A05 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: a) In the warehouse/fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings identified front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments with the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation. This violation was discovered on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 A06 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition a) In the warehouse/fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were maintained in a legible condition. This violation was discovered on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) The employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to silica dust. This violation was observed on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
02004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-12-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-12-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-01-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use a) The employer did not have safety data sheets for each of the granites that they fabricate. This violation was observed on or about July 26, 2018. |
|
