| Entity Name: | LENAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC. |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Florida Limited Liability Co.
LENAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC. is structured as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a common business structure that offers its members limited liability protection, separating their personal assets from the company's debts and obligations. |
| Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
| Date Filed: | 20 Jan 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Date of dissolution: | 23 Sep 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Last Event: | ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT |
| Event Date Filed: | 23 Sep 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Document Number: | L15000011423 |
| FEI/EIN Number |
472835867
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
| Address: | 606 LINNET CT, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34759 |
| Mail Address: | 606 LINNET CT, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34759 |
| ZIP code: | 34759 |
| County: | Polk |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| PENA COLON SAUL | Member | 110 LAKE ELSIE DR, HAINES CITY, FL, 33844 |
| SANCHEZ HUERTAS DAVID | Authorized Member | 303 20TH STREET NORTH, HAINES CITY, FL, 33844 |
| PENA COLON SAUL | Agent | 110 LAKE ELSIE DR, HAINES CITY, FL, 33844 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2016-09-23 | - | - |
| REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2015-10-19 | 110 LAKE ELSIE DR, HAINES CITY, FL 33844 | - |
| REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED | 2015-10-19 | PENA COLON, SAUL | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-10-19 | - | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-09-14 | - | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-08-14 | - | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-08-13 | - | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-08-04 | - | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-07-31 | - | - |
| LC AMENDMENT | 2015-07-28 | - | - |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| LC Amendment | 2015-10-19 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-09-14 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-08-14 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-08-13 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-08-04 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-07-31 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-07-28 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-07-13 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-03-30 |
| LC Amendment | 2015-03-23 |
| Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340897479 | 0420600 | 2015-09-03 | 701 VIRTUOSO LN, ORLANDO, FL, 32824 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Type | Inspection |
| Activity Nr | 1089753 |
| Safety | Yes |
Violation Items
| Citation ID | 01001 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date | 2015-11-02 |
| Current Penalty | 1360.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 1360.0 |
| Final Order | 2016-01-14 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 2 |
| Gravity | 5 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. At the jobsite, eye protection was not provided to employees operating pneumatic nail guns, exposing employees to a struck-by hazard, on or about 9/3/2015. |
| Citation ID | 01002 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19261053 B05 I |
| Issuance Date | 2015-11-02 |
| Current Penalty | 1360.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 1360.0 |
| Final Order | 2016-01-14 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 1 |
| Gravity | 5 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: a. At the front of unit 82, the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the portable extension ladder was approximately one-half of the working length of the ladder, exposing an employee to an 8 foot fall hazard, on or about 9/3/2015. |
Date of last update: 01 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
