Search icon

BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO LLC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO LLC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Florida Limited Liability Co.

BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO LLC is structured as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a common business structure that offers its members limited liability protection, separating their personal assets from the company's debts and obligations.
In Florida, LLCs are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 605, Florida Revised Limited Liability Company Act

Status: Inactive

The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders.

Date Filed: 08 Apr 2014 (11 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 25 Sep 2020 (5 years ago)
Last Event: ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed: 25 Sep 2020 (5 years ago)
Document Number: L14000057244
FEI/EIN Number 46-5343990

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 820 GIBSON RD LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 32547, US
Mail Address: 820 GIBSON RD LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 32547, US
ZIP code: 32547
County: Okaloosa
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
VARGAS NATHANAEL Manager 820 GIBSON RD LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 32547
FANELLA NICHOLAS Agent 434 TANGLEWOOD DRIVE, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL, 32547

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2020-09-25 - -
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2016-03-31 820 GIBSON RD LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32547 -
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2016-03-31 820 GIBSON RD LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32547 -

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-04-26
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-03-13
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-03-21
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-03-31
ANNUAL REPORT 2015-02-26
Florida Limited Liability 2014-04-08

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
343165973 0419700 2018-05-17 26 EAGLE LANDING, INLET BEACH, FL, 32413
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2018-05-17
Emphasis P: FALL, L: FALL
Case Closed 2018-10-25

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 B01
Issuance Date 2018-06-28
Current Penalty 2328.0
Initial Penalty 3880.0
Final Order 2018-07-26
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) a. On or about May 17, 2018, on a 4-level scaffold system an employee installing stucco was not protected from a 26-foot fall hazard, in that the platform he was working on was not fully planked.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 B03
Issuance Date 2018-06-28
Current Penalty 2328.0
Initial Penalty 3880.0
Final Order 2018-07-26
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph(g) of this section to protect employees from falling: a. On or about May 17, 2018, on a 4-level scaffold system, an employee applying stucco to a structure was not protected from a fall hazard in that the scaffold was erected 26 inches from the wall.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2018-06-28
Current Penalty 1995.6
Initial Penalty 3326.0
Final Order 2018-07-26
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a. On or about May 17, 2018, on a 4-level scaffold system, there was no ladder attached for access/egress, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 H02 II
Issuance Date 2018-06-28
Current Penalty 1995.6
Initial Penalty 3326.0
Final Order 2018-07-26
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a. On or about May 17, 2018, on a 4-level scaffold system, there were no toeboards installed on the working platform, exposing employees to an overhead hazard.
340962679 0419700 2015-10-05 12805 U.S. HWY 98 E BLDG. I, INLET BEACH, FL, 32413
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2015-10-05
Emphasis L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2018-02-01

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01 V
Issuance Date 2015-10-26
Current Penalty 2440.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2015-11-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway: a. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, an employee installing stucco to the facing of the building was using a scaffold that did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to a 13 feet 4 inch fall hazard. b. On or about October 5, 2015 on the northwest side of a new commercial structure, an employee working on a scaffold to load a forklift did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to a 25 feet fall hazard.
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 E01
Issuance Date 2015-10-26
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2015-11-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access: a. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, an employee working on a frame scaffold did not use a ladder to exit and access the scaffold, exposing the employee to a 25 feet fall hazard. b. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, two employees working on a frame scaffold did not use a ladder to exit and access the scaffold, exposing the employees to a 13 feet 4 inch fall hazard.
Citation ID 01001C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 H02 II
Issuance Date 2015-10-26
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2015-11-09
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial building, employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use toeboards on the edges, exposing the employee to struck-by hazards.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260501 B01
Issuance Date 2015-10-26
Current Penalty 2440.0
Initial Penalty 4900.0
Final Order 2015-11-09
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On the northwest side of the structure, an employee applying stucco material to the gable of a commercial building was not protected from a 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system.

Date of last update: 02 May 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State