| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-10-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: FORKLIFT
|
| Case Closed |
2018-01-24
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1145667 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100101 B |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-10 |
| Current Penalty |
1303.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
2173.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6: Section 3.1.10- Do not deface or remove any markings, labels, decals, tags and stencil marks used for identification of content attached by the supplier: a. On or about October 20, 2016, at the Mechanical shop, a compressed gas cylinder did not have any markings, label, decal, tags or stencil mark for identification of content. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100101 B |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6: 3.4.4- Before using cylinder, be sure it is properly supported to prevent it from being knocked over: a. On or about October 20, 2016, at the Mechanical shop, the employer did not have the compressed gas cylinders secured with a rope or chain to prevent an accidental knock over, exposing employees to a fire and struck-by hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-10 |
| Current Penalty |
1738.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
2897.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. On or about October 20, 2016, in the car-body work and painting areas, the employer did not conduct medical evaluations for employees prior being fit tested for the use of tight-fitting respirators. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-10 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a. On or about October 20, 2016, in the car-body preparation, priming and painting areas, the employer did not fit-test employees prior to the use of tight-fitting respirators. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 P01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-10 |
| Current Penalty |
2607.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
4346.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): a. On or about October 20, 2016, in auto shop, the Clark forklift had a defective horn and defective backup alarm, exposing employees to struck-by hazards. b. On or about October 20, 2016, in auto shop, the Clark forklift had the lifting hydraulic lines worn out in the mast assembly, exposing employees to struck-by hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 F06 II |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-10 |
| Current Penalty |
1303.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
2173.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: a. On or about October 20, 2016, at the paint mixing room, the employer did not ensure that two plastic bottles containing lacquer thinner used by employees were properly labeled with the name and the hazards of the chemical contained therein. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 A06 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-10 |
| Current Penalty |
245.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
406.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-02-10 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition: a. On or about October 20, 2016, in auto shop, the employer did not ensure that the nameplate of the Clark forklift was legible for the operator to read the capacity information to prevent a caught-in or struck-by hazard. |
|
|
