|
346180961
|
0418600
|
2022-08-30
|
LOT# 148 - 188 CARAWAY DRIVE, NICEVILLE, FL, 32578
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-08-30
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-11-30
|
|
|
345815757
|
0418600
|
2022-03-03
|
206 BILTMORE WAY, NICEVILLE, FL, 32578
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-03-04
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-05-31
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2022-03-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2022-03-29 |
| Current Penalty |
4972.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4972.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-04-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) 206 Biltmore Way, Niceville FL; On or about March 03, 2022 the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that the employee was allowed to work from the elevated level surfaces of a ladder scaffolding at measured heights of 16'-2" and 16' - 10" without any fall protection, such as but not limited to guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems or safety net systems. |
|
|
|
341125854
|
0419700
|
2015-12-15
|
1006 DUNE ALLEN DRIVE, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL, 32459
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-12-15
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-01-17
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-01-29 |
| Current Penalty |
2520.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4200.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-02-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about December 15, 2015, on the north side of the residential house, a foreman installing asphalt shingles to a roof while using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear approved eye protection, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck in the eye or face by flying debris. b. On or about December 15, 2015, on the south side of the residential house, an employee installing asphalt shingles to a roof while using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear eye protection, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck in the eye or face by flying debris. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-01-29 |
| Current Penalty |
5880.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
9800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-02-09 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a. On or about December 15, 2015, on the north side of the residential house, an employee working on a framed structure was not protected from a 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall protection system. b. On or about December 15, 2015, on the south side of the residential house, an employee working on a framed structure was not protected from a 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall protection system. CFH Construction, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 107711, citation number 01, item number 03 and was affirmed as a final order on December 3, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 158 Blue Crab Loop East, Seacrest, FL 32413. |
|
|
|
340077114
|
0419700
|
2014-11-12
|
158 BLUE CRAB LOOP EAST, SEACREST, FL, 32413
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-11-12
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2015-12-24
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
5A0001 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-12-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: the employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a. On or about November 12, 2014, in the interior of the structure, five employees used a wooden job made ladder without filler blocks inserted between the rungs to support the cleats, nor did the ladder have a 2 x 6 side rails, exposing themselves to a fall hazard. b. On or about November 12, 2014, in the interior of the structure, five employees used a wooden job made ladder that did not have adequate support, in that there were not three nails per side, per rung installed on the ladder, exposing the employees to a fall hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to, but not limited to the following: (1) conform to the American National Standard Institute (ANSI) A14.4-1992, section 4.5.2. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-12-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about November 12, 2014, employees at the jobsite conducting framing operations were not wearing protective helmets, exposing themselves to overhead hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-12-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a. On or about November 12, 2014, on a carpenter's bracket scaffold system, an employee performing framing operations was not protected from a 17-foot fall hazard by use of a personal fall arrest system or guardrail system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-12-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed a. On or about November 12, 2014, five employees used a wooden ladder to access the 2nd level of a structure improperly, in that the ladder did not extend 3 feet over the landing, exposing the employee to a fall hazard. |
|
|
