| Docket Date |
2022-07-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant Substitution of Counsel ~ ORDERED that the July 27, 2022 unopposed motion for substitution of counsel is granted, and the law firm of DLA Piper LLP (US) is substituted for the law firm of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P. as counsel for Smith & Wesson Corp. N/K/A Smith & Wesson Sales Company in the above-styled cause.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-27
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted
|
| Description |
Order-Original Proceeding Granted ~ ORDERED that, having considered the response and reply to this Court’s order to show cause, the petition is granted. The order denying the motion for entry of a final order is quashed, and the trial court is directed to enter a final order of dismissal.WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-15
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Granted
|
| Description |
Granted - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Grant EOT to Reply to Response ~ ORDERED that petitioners' May 24, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted. The time for filing a reply is extended to June 2, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-24
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion Extension of Time To Reply To Response
|
| Description |
Motion Extension of TimeTo Reply To Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that the April 20, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted. The time for Sunrise Tactical Supply, LLC to file a response is extended to May 14, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-20
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that respondent Sunrise Tactical Supply, LLC's April 19, 2021 motion for extension of time is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-19
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ ***STRICKEN 4/20/21***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Grant EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that respondent Smith & Wesson Corp. N/K/A Smith & Wesson Sales Company's April 13, 2021 motion is granted. The time for filing a response is extended thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-13
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Petition
|
| Description |
ORD-Writs Show Cause with Reply ~ ORDERED that, within twenty (20) days of this order, respondents shall file a response to the petition and show cause why the relief requested should not be granted. Respondents shall also address whether mandamus is the appropriate remedy. See Abramowitz v. Pechter, 710 So. 2d 756, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Cole v. Garrison, 622 So. 2d 155, 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Petitioners may file a reply within ten (10) days of service of the last response.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-18
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Certiorari
|
| Description |
Petition for Certiorari Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that petitioners' January 12, 2021 motion is granted. The time for filing a petition and appendix is extended to February 18, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-12
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Reclassifying Case
|
| Description |
ORD-NOA Treated as Writ ~ ORDERED that appellees’ motion to dismiss incorporated in its December 7, 2020 response is denied. Further,Upon consideration of appellants’ November 25, 2020 jurisdictional brief, it is ORDERED that this case shall proceed as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the November 4, 2020 “order denying plaintiffs’ motion for entry of a final and appealable order.” Petitioners shall file a petition and appendix in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100 within twenty (20) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Joinder in Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Joinder ~ OF JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Smith & Wesson, Corp.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-18
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Frederic Guttenberg
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
