| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2014-10-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, P: FALL, L: FALL, L: EISAX
|
| Case Closed |
2015-10-01
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-29 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) At the site, employees were exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not used while installing gutters on a residence, on or about 10/19/2014.. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-17 |
| Current Penalty |
720.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) At the site, on the north side of the roof, an extension ladder utilized to gain access to the roof was not erected properly. The side rails of the ladder extended 1 rung (12 inches) above the landing / access surface, exposing employees to a 10 (9.8) feet fall hazard, observed on or about 10/29/2014. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) There was no hazard communication program that ensured employees received effective information and training on hazardous chemicals used in their work such GeoGel 2023 Silicone, on or about 10/29/2014. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-11-17 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-11-25 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) The employer failed to ensure and or provide certification of fall protection training of employees who were exposed to a fall hazards on or about 10/29/2014. |
|
|
