Docket Date |
2024-11-27
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-27
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
ORDERED that Appellee's February 26, 2024 motion for attorney's fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that Appellee is the prevailing party and, if so, setting the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-06
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-27
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response to Motion to Dismiss
|
On Behalf Of |
Leo Koel
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-26
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-26
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Lauren Marie Self
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
Description |
ORDERED that Appellant is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to Appellee Lauren Marie Self's January 26, 2024 motion to dismiss.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-01-26
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
Motion To Dismiss Appellant's Appeal for Untimely Filing the Initial Brief
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-01-26
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
ORDERED that Appellee Lauren Marie Self's January 19, 2024 motion for extension of time is granted, and Appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before February 26, 2024. In addition, Appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose Appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-01-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-12-28
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Leo Koel
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-12-28
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Record on Appeal; 427 Pages
|
On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-12-27
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Inability
|
Description |
Notice of Inability to Transmit Record on Appeal
|
On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-10-27
|
Type |
Event
|
Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-10-27
|
Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
Description |
Paid Case Filing Fee-300
|
On Behalf Of |
Leo Koel
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
Order on Filing Fee
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-03-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's February 27, 2024 response, appellee Lauren Marie Self's January 26, 2024 motion to dismiss appeal is denied. See Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79-80 (Fla. 1976) ("Where an order after judgment is dispositive of any question, it becomes a final post decretal order. To the extent that it completes the judicial labor on that portion of the cause after judgment, it becomes final as to that portion and should be treated as a final judgment[.]"); see also J.J.K. Int'l, Inc. v. Shivbaran, 985 So. 2d 66, 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ("acknowledging that Florida public policy favors "deciding a case on its merits rather than on a technicality.").
|
View |
View File
|
|