Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Complete
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2014-06-20
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: FORKLIFT, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2015-02-25
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
979916 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
979959 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
892248 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
979893 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2014-07-03 |
Current Penalty |
7350.0 |
Initial Penalty |
9800.0 |
Final Order |
2014-08-27 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
Pita U.S. Investments, LLC, was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 957359, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on April 21, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 13786 Bridgewater Crossing Boulevard, Windermere, Florida 34786. 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about June 3, 2014, an employee, working on the second level of the northwest side of building 3000, was exposed to a 22-foot, 6-inch fall hazard in that the employee was not protected by a fall protection system. b. On or about June 3, 2014, an employee, working on the third level of the southeast side of building 3000, was exposed to a 24-foot, fall hazard if falling outside of the structure, a 10-foot, 8-inch fall hazard if falling on the inside of the structure and was not protected by a fall protection system. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19260020 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-07-03 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-08-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard: a. On or about June 3, 2014, at the worksite, a safety and health program had not been initiated and maintained which addressed the following basic elements: 1. Management Commitment and Leadership A. Policy statement: goals established, issued, and communicated to employees. B. Program Reviewed Annually. C. Participation in safety meetings, inspections; agenda item in meet D. Adequate commitment of resources. E. Safety rules and procedures incorporated into site operations. F. Management observations of safety rules. 2. Assignment of Responsibility A. Safety designee on site, knowledgeable, and accountable. B. Supervisors' (including foremen) safety and health responsibilities understood. C. Employees adherence to safety rules. 3. Identification and Control of Hazards A. Periodic site inspection program involving supervisors. B. Preventive controls in place (PPE, Maintenance, Engineering Controls). C. Action taken to address hazards. D. Safety Committee, where appropriate. E. Technical reference materials available. 4. Training and Education A. Supervisors receive basic safety and health training. B. Specialized training taken when needed. C. Existence of an employee training program, which is ongoing and effective. 5. Recordkeeping and Hazard Analysis |
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2014-01-29
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL, L: FORKLIFT
|
Case Closed |
2014-05-12
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
956576 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260453 B02 V |
Issuance Date |
2014-03-03 |
Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated a. On or about 01/29/2014, at the job site - the use of personal fall protection was not enforced while operating an aerial lift to lift material and nailing a wood board, exposing the worker to a 26 feet fall hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2014-03-03 |
Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
Final Order |
2014-04-21 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. At the job site, an employee conducting wood framing was exposed to a 21 feet 2 inches fall hazard, in that, the use of fall protection was not enforced, on or about 01/29/2014. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260503 A02 |
Issuance Date |
2014-03-03 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-03-13 |
Current Penalty |
720.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
Final Order |
2014-05-12 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) a. At the job site, an employee conducting wood framing was not provided with fall protection training, on or about 01/29/2014. |
|
|