| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Timothy Hatten
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 19, 2023 motion to show cause is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service is insufficient. You are notified of the requirement to serve the appellee with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the appellee.Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the appellee within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ **STRICKEN** MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Timothy Hatten
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Reinstate ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 19, 2023 "motion to reinstate appeal and hold cases in abeyance until the trial court disposes of the motions that was pending before the lower district court for puling pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 9.020(h)(1)" is denied on jurisdictional grounds. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k); Almacenes El Globo De Quito, S.A. v. Dalbeta L.C., 181 So. 3d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding an order was not appealable as a partial final judgment because an interrelated counterclaim remained pending in the trial court).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Show Cause
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's January 19, 2023 motion to reinstate, appellant is directed to show cause, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to why the motion should not be denied on jurisdictional grounds, as it appears a counterclaim is pending in the lower court. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) ("A partial final judgment, other than one that disposes of an entire case as to any party, is one that disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims."); Almacenes El Globo De Quito, S.A. v. Dalbeta L.C., 181 So. 3d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding an order was not appealable as a partial final judgment because an interrelated counterclaim remained pending in the trial court). Appellee may file a reply within five (5) days of service of appellant's response.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s January 19, 2023 motion to reinstate appeal and hold cases in abeyance.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s January 19, 2023 motion to reinstate appeal and hold cases in abeyance.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-19
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
| Description |
Motion For Reinstatement ~ MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE TRIAL COURT DISPOSES OF THE MOTIONS THAT WAS PENDING BEFORE THE LOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR RULING PURSUANT TO FLORIDA APPELLATE RULE 9.020(h)(l)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Timothy Hatten
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-18
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-18
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF NON-TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD BY THE CLERK OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief/ROA ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this record, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief and the record-on-appeal have not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice.If the initial brief and record-on-appeal are filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document
|
| Description |
Misc. LT pleadings ~ *Civil Cover Sheet
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Timothy Hatten
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
