Docket Date |
2021-05-20
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Closed
|
Description |
Case Closed
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-04-14
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The motion for reconsideration and/or rehearing en banc and the motion forreconsideration and/or rehearing, or in the alternative, motion for a written opinion arestricken as unauthorized as to Appellant Lloyd Realty, LLC. See Parrot Cove Marina v.Duncan Seawall Dock, 978 So. 2d 811, 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ("[A] corporation mustbe represented by an attorney to defend or prosecute a lawsuit.").The motion for reconsideration and/or rehearing en banc and the motion forreconsideration and/or rehearing, or in the alternative, motion for a written opinion aredenied with respect to the remaining appellants. See Gomez v. S & I Props., LLC, 220So. 3d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding that because an order denying dismissal of acomplaint in favor of arbitration did not determine any party's entitlement to arbitration,but merely denied dismissal, it was not a nonfinal, appealable order under rule9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv)).
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-04-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellants’ Motion for Permission to File Reply to Appellee’s Response in opposition to: Motion for Reconsideration and/or Rehearing, or in thealternative, Motion for a Written Opinion and Motion for Reconsideration and/or Rehearing en banc is denied.Appellants’ Reply to Appellee’s Response in Opposition to: Motion for Reconsideration and/or Rehearing, or in the alternative, Motion for a Written Opinion and Motion for Reconsideration and/or Rehearing en banc is stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-30
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE REPLY TO APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A WRITTEN OPINION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING EN BANC
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-30
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Reply
|
Description |
REPLY ~ APPELLANTS' REPLY TO APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A WRITTEN OPINION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING EN BANC
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-25
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ IN OPPOSITION TO: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND MOTION FOR A WRITTEN OPINION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING EN BANC
|
On Behalf Of |
ANNEMARIE BRALICH
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-25
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE
|
On Behalf Of |
ANNEMARIE BRALICH
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-15
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
Description |
Motion For Reconsideration ~ AND/OR REHEARING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A WRITTEN OPINION
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-15
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
Description |
Motion For Rehearing EN BANC ~ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR REHEARING EN BANC
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
dismiss appeal nonfinal/nonappealable order ~ This appeal is dismissed as an appeal from a nonfinal nonappealable order.The motion of law school graduate to represent indigent corporation appellant, or in the alternative, of law school graduate to represent indigent corporation appellant until counsel is retained on pro-bono or contingency basis and the motion for extension of time to file initial brief are denied as moot.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ Casanueva, Villanti, and Smith
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The motion of law school graduate to represent indigent corporation appellant, or in the alternative, of law school graduate to represent indigent corporation appellant until counsel is retained on pro-bono or contingency basis and the motion for extension of time to file initial brief are denied as moot.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-05
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-05
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Initial Brief
|
Description |
Appendix for Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-05
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-22
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS' MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
ANNEMARIE BRALICH
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-18
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ SHOWING CAUSE WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS FROM A NONFINAL, NONAPPEALABLE ORDER
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-03
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-17
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION OF LAW SCHOOL GRADUATE TO REPRESENT INDIGENT CORPORATION APPELLANT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, OF LAW SCHOOL GRADUATE TO REPRESENT INDIGENT CORPORATION APPELLANT UNTIL COUNSEL IS RETAINED ON PRO-BONO OR CONTINGENCY BASIS
|
On Behalf Of |
ASSEL LLOYD
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
fee - civil; pro se
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-05
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-03
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
VLADIMIR BOYKOV
|
|