Search icon

HDU STATE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, LLC - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: HDU STATE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, LLC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Florida Limited Liability Co.

HDU STATE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, LLC is structured as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a common business structure that offers its members limited liability protection, separating their personal assets from the company's debts and obligations.
In Florida, LLCs are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 605, Florida Revised Limited Liability Company Act

Status: Active

The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness.

Date Filed: 25 Aug 2011 (14 years ago)
Document Number: L11000097738
FEI/EIN Number 320250270

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 27805 SW 165TH AVE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33031
Mail Address: 27805 SW 165TH AVE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33031
ZIP code: 33031
County: Miami-Dade
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
HERNANDEZ-DIAZ ULISES Chief Executive Officer 27805 SW 165TH AVE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33031
Bruera Maria C Manager 27805 SW 165TH AVE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33031
HERNANDEZ-DIAZ ULISES Agent 27805 SW 165TH AVE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33031

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-02-27
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-03-06
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-02-17
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-03-05
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-04-09
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-02-25
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-03-28
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-02-13
AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 2016-12-05
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-04-29

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
341763068 0418800 2016-09-09 8000 HARDING AVENUE, MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33141
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2016-09-09
Emphasis L: SILICA, N: SILICA
Case Closed 2017-03-30

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 1170973
Health Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1170973
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 C
Issuance Date 2017-02-13
Abatement Due Date 2017-03-31
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about September 9, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not have a written respirator program for the employees who are required by the employer to wear 3M 8511 Particulate N95 Respirators when performing operations with concrete that could produce silica dust.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 E01
Issuance Date 2017-02-13
Abatement Due Date 2017-03-31
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about September 9, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for the employees who are required by the employer to wear 3M 8511 N95 Particulate Respirators when performing operations with concrete that could produce silica dust.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 E01
Issuance Date 2017-02-13
Abatement Due Date 2017-03-31
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about September 9, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for the employees who work with chemicals such as Epojet Epoxy, Planicrete AC Acrylic Latex Mortar and Concrete. These chemicals can cause respiratory aliments and dermatitis.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 G01
Issuance Date 2017-02-13
Abatement Due Date 2017-03-31
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used: On or about September 9, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer provided product information sheets in lieu of safety data sheets for chemicals used such as such as Epojet Epoxy, Planicrete AC Acrylic Latex Mortar and Concrete.
341709731 0418800 2016-08-17 8000 HARDING AVENUE,, MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33141
Inspection Type Fat/Cat
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2016-08-17
Emphasis L: FALL
Case Closed 2018-02-13

Related Activity

Type Accident
Activity Nr 1126809
Type Referral
Activity Nr 1179854
Health Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1176306
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260020 B02
Issuance Date 2017-02-06
Abatement Due Date 2017-02-16
Current Penalty 4200.0
Initial Penalty 12675.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections of the job site were made around the truck, to ensure that the scaffold suspension cables were not subject to damage or disturbance and were not in the path of the wheels of the truck.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 D03 X
Issuance Date 2017-02-06
Abatement Due Date 2017-02-16
Current Penalty 1800.0
Initial Penalty 2716.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(d)(3)(x): Tiebacks were not installed perpendicular to the face of the building or structure, nor were opposing angle tiebacks installed: On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees who had been performing concrete restoration work from the East suspended swing stage scaffold, were exposed to fall hazards as the scaffold had been secured from 2 parapet clamps, each with a single tie back that had not been installed perpendicular to the face of the building.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G01 II
Issuance Date 2017-02-06
Abatement Due Date 2017-02-16
Current Penalty 10000.0
Initial Penalty 12675.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system: On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addresses job site, an employee who was performing masonry work from a swing stage scaffold without a means of fall protection was exposed to a 60-foot fall hazard.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260451 G03 I
Issuance Date 2017-02-06
Abatement Due Date 2017-02-16
Current Penalty 1000.0
Initial Penalty 2716.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 5
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Vertical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffold, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion: On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addresses job site, employees who were performing concrete restoration work from swing stage scaffolds had been using lifelines that were not in conformance with this standard: 2 Instances a. Five lifelines lacked abrasion protection that were in direct contact with sharp edges of the roof and the parapet wall. b. Two lifelines were secured to a ladder and lifelines were secured to parapet clamps that supported tiebacks.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19260451 D12 IV
Issuance Date 2017-02-06
Abatement Due Date 2017-02-10
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 305.0
Final Order 2017-03-03
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.451(d)(12)(iv): Wire rope clips were not inspected and retightened to the manufacturer's recommendations at the start of each work shift and thereafter: On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees who had been performing concrete restoration work, were exposed to a fall hazard while using swing stage scaffolds which were suspended by wire rope cables from parapet clamps which had tie backs that that had wire rope clamps that had not been retightened to the manufacturer's recommendations at the start of each work shift.

Date of last update: 03 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State