Search icon

125 POCO, LLC

Company Details

Entity Name: 125 POCO, LLC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Florida Limited Liability Company
Status: Inactive
Date Filed: 07 Jun 2011 (14 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 27 Sep 2024 (4 months ago)
Last Event: ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed: 27 Sep 2024 (4 months ago)
Document Number: L11000066731
FEI/EIN Number 45-3192497
Address: 127 BAYSHORE ROAD, NOKOMIS, FL 34275
Mail Address: PO BOX 2549, greenville, NC 27386
ZIP code: 34275
County: Sarasota
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Agent

Name Role Address
SCHLEGEL, ROBERT R. Agent 127 BAYSHORE ROAD, NOKOMIS, FL 34275

Authorized Member

Name Role Address
SCHLEGEL, ROBERT R. Authorized Member 127 BAYSHORE ROAD, NOKOMIS, FL 34275

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2024-09-27 No data No data
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2020-03-19 127 BAYSHORE ROAD, NOKOMIS, FL 34275 No data
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED 2020-03-13 SCHLEGEL, ROBERT R. No data

Court Cases

Title Case Number Docket Date Status
ROSEMARY G. KING, 125 POCO, LLC, AND 123 POCO, LLC VS BRUCE ROORDA AND DENISE ROORDA 2D2022-0678 2022-03-03 Closed
Classification NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
Court 2nd District Court of Appeal
Originating Court Circuit Court for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County
2018-CA-000978NC

Parties

Name ROSEMARY G. KING
Role Appellant
Status Active
Representations JAMES D. GIBSON, ESQ.
Name 123 POCO, LLC
Role Appellant
Status Active
Name 125 POCO, LLC
Role Appellant
Status Active
Name BRUCE ROORDA
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name DENISE ROORDA
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name MICHAEL J. MICONI
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name WILLIAM R. GROSZ
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name SHARON D. BARTIMAY
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name KELLY G. ROPER
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name HON. HUNTER CARROLL
Role Judge/Judicial Officer
Status Active
Name SARASOTA CLERK
Role Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status Active
Name ELIZABETH CLAUSON
Role Appellee
Status Active
Representations MORGAN R. BENTLEY, ESQ., AMANDA R. KISON, ESQ., TIMOTHY J. RUDGE, ESQ.

Docket Entries

Docket Date 2023-05-02
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion For Clarification
Description Deny Clarification-78a ~ Appellees' motion for clarification is denied.
Docket Date 2023-04-11
Type Post-Disposition Motions
Subtype Motion For Clarification
Description Motion For Clarification
On Behalf Of DENISE ROORDA
Docket Date 2023-02-22
Type Misc. Events
Subtype West Publishing
Description West Publishing
Docket Date 2023-02-21
Type Mandate
Subtype Mandate
Description Mandate
Docket Date 2023-02-06
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Change of Address
Description Notice of Change of Address
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2023-02-03
Type Disposition by Opinion
Subtype Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part
Description Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part - Authored Opinion ~ and remanded.
Docket Date 2022-12-20
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Oral Argument Date Set
Description Oral Argument Date Set ~ Remote
Docket Date 2022-09-06
Type Motions Relating to Oral Argument
Subtype Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Request for Oral Argument ~ APPELLEES' REQUEST FOR VIDEO ARGUMENT
On Behalf Of BRUCE ROORDA
Docket Date 2022-08-23
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Amended OA Request Permitted ~ A request for oral argument has been filed in this case. Within five days from the date of this order, any party may file a request that the argument be conducted by video. The manner of oral argument will be decided in the court's discretion. A video request must state the reason in support, and it must indicate that the requesting party has consulted opposing counsel and is authorized to represent that opposing counsel either has no objection or will file an objection. A party objecting to a request to conduct oral argument by video must file a response within five days after service of the request.
Docket Date 2022-08-23
Type Response
Subtype Objection
Description OBJECTION ~ APPELLEES' MEMORADUM IN OPPOSITION TO ORAL ARGUEMENT
On Behalf Of DENISE ROORDA
Docket Date 2022-08-22
Type Motions Relating to Oral Argument
Subtype Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Request for Oral Argument
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-08-22
Type Brief
Subtype Reply Brief
Description Appellant Reply Brief
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-08-03
Type Response
Subtype Objection
Description OBJECTION
On Behalf Of DENISE ROORDA
Docket Date 2022-08-03
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description grant eot for reply brief - unlikely ~ Appellants’ motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall beserved by August 22, 2022. However, further motions for extension of time are unlikelyto receive favorable consideration.
Docket Date 2022-08-01
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-07-01
Type Brief
Subtype Answer Brief
Description Appellee Answer Brief
On Behalf Of DENISE ROORDA
Docket Date 2022-06-01
Type Brief
Subtype Amended Initial Brief
Description Amended Appellant Initial Brief
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-05-31
Type Brief
Subtype Initial Brief
Description Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-05-20
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellants’ motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shallbe served by May 31, 2022.
Docket Date 2022-05-10
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-04-14
Type Record
Subtype Record on Appeal
Description Received Records ~ CARROLL - REDACTED - 2723 PAGES
Docket Date 2022-03-04
Type Letter
Subtype Acknowledgment Letter
Description Acknowledgment Letter 1
Docket Date 2022-03-03
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Appeal
Description Notice of Appeal Filed ~ W/ORDER
On Behalf Of ROSEMARY G. KING
Docket Date 2022-03-03
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Fee Status
Description A3:Paid In Full - $300
Docket Date 2022-10-13
Type Order
Subtype Order Re: Video Oral Argument
Description OA Notice Video ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2022, at 9:30 A.M., before: Judge Craig C. Villanti, Judge Nelly N. Khouzam, Judge Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim. The oral argument will be conducted by video conference. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to sign in by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date. If this is a criminal proceeding where a victim, as defined in article I, section 16(e), Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under article I, section 16(b)(6), the State is directed to provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website.Within ten days from the date of this order, any attorney or party who will be presenting argument is requested to provide the Clerk of the Court with the email address where the video invitation should be sent and a telephone number. This information may be sent by email to 2dcaClerk@flcourts.org. The Clerk of the Court will provide each participant with connection instructions, including the opportunity for a test session, before the argument.
Docket Date 2022-03-04
Type Order
Subtype Order on Filing Fee
Description fee - civil; atty ~ This appeal has been filed without a filing fee required by section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, Florida Statutes.If the attorney for appellant has not already done so, they shall forward the required $300.00 filing fee or, if applicable, a certificate or order of the lower tribunal finding appellant insolvent pursuant to section 57.081, Florida Statutes, within twenty days from the date of this order.If this court does not receive either of the above within the prescribed time, this appeal may be subject to dismissal without further notice.

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-04-11
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-03-07
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-01-22
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-03-13
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-02-11
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-02-05
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-02-10
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-04-08
ANNUAL REPORT 2015-03-25
ANNUAL REPORT 2014-01-10

Date of last update: 24 Jan 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State