| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2014-06-16
|
| Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: LEAD, P: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2015-03-24
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100024 B |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.24(b): Fixed stairs were not provided for access from one structure level to another where operations necessitated regular travel between levels, and for access to operating platforms at any equipment which requires attention routinely during operations: a. On or about June 23, 2014, the employer did not provide access from the top of the silo to the platform of the dust collector area at the back of the Shooting Range Room, exposing employees to a 10 feet fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a. An employee dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 11.74 times. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 F02 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2): A written respiratory protection program in accordance with � 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use. a. On or about June 16, 2014, employees were required to wear a 3M Full Face Air Purifying Respirator (3M model 78006 with 3M FR-64 P100/Organic Vapor Cartridge) during the gun range clean-up activities such as but not limited to, dry-vacuuming lead dust and changing the filters at the Back of Shooting Range Room. The employer had not established nor implemented a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 E01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(ii): For any employee who is exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for 30 days or less per year, the employer did not implement engineering controls to reduce the exposure to 200 micrograms per cubic meter: a. An employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 11.74 times. The limit was established to prevent lead poisoning. In accordance with 29 CFR1910.1025, the air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not implement an effective engineering control to reduce the employees' exposure to lead below the level of 200 micrograms per cubic meter. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002D |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 E03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: a. An employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 11.74 times. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not establish a written compliance program outlining specific engineering controls to be implemented to reduce employee lead exposures to below the Permissible Exposure Level (PEL). The written plan shall include at least the requirements set forth in sections 1910.1025(e) (3)(ii)(A)-(H). |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a. An employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the Action Level (AL) of 0.03 mg/m3 by approximately 19.56 times. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not make an initial determination regarding their exposure to lead while cleaning the dust in the Back of Shooting Range Room to determine if they were exposed to lead at or above the action level. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 G01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1)(ii): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an 8-hour period, without regard to the use of respirators or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists. The employer did not provide at no cost to the employee and assure that the employee uses appropriate protective work clothing and equipment such as, but not limited to gloves, hats, and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets: a. An employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 11.74 times. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not provide shoes or disposable shoe coverlets to the employee. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 G02 II |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide for the cleaning, laundering, or disposal of protective clothing and equipment against lead: a. An employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded two hundred micrograms per cubic meter as an eight hour time weighted average. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not ensure that work clothing worn by the employee was cleaned , laundered or disposed of in according to 29 CFR 1910.1925(g)(1). |
|
| Citation ID |
01004C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-06-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: a. An employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 11.74 times. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not assure that the employee with exposures to airborne lead concentrations exceeding the Permissible Exposure Level (PELs) showered at the end of the work shift. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a. An employee who was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Back of Shooting Range Room was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.59 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the Action Level (AL) of 0.03 mg/m3 by approximately 19.56 times. The air sampling was performed for 85 minutes during one work-shift on June 23, 2014. The employer did not inform the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025 regulation for employees who had potential exposure to airborne lead. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about June 16, 2014, the employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program for an employee working with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to lead, grease and break-free CLP. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 G08 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: a. On or about June 16, 2014, the employer did not maintain the copies of the required material safety data sheets for materials such as but not limit lead, grease and break-free CLP. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005D |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about June 16, 2014, the employer had not provided information and training to employees who were exposed to hazardous materials such as but not limit to lead, grease and break-free CLP. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005E |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H03 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a. On or about June 16, 2014, the employer did not provide the information and training on the new label elements and the new Safety Data Sheet format to employees who had exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to lead, grease and break-free CLP. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-09-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-31 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a. The employer did not ensure that surfaces including, but not limited to, lunch room table, restroom door handle, faucet in the restroom, refrigerator door handle, and Ridgid hand drill holder were maintained as free as practicable of lead accumulations. |
|
|
