| Entity Name: | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Florida Limited Liability Co.
BINK REALTY LLC is structured as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a common business structure that offers its members limited liability protection, separating their personal assets from the company's debts and obligations. |
| Status: |
Active
The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness. |
| Date Filed: | 11 Jan 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Last Event: | REINSTATEMENT |
| Event Date Filed: | 29 Sep 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Document Number: | L11000004512 |
| FEI/EIN Number |
275391921
Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS. |
| Address: | 1020 Murano Bay Dr, Boynton Beach, FL, 33435, US |
| Mail Address: | 1020 MURANO BAY DR., BOYNTON BEACH, FL, 33435, US |
| ZIP code: | 33435 |
| County: | Palm Beach |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez Thomas | Managing Member | 430 32nd Street, West Palm Beach, FL, 33407 |
| Gonzalez Thomas | Agent | 430 32nd Street, West Palm Beach, FL, 33407 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2025-01-28 | 1020 MURANO BAY DR., BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435 | - |
| CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 2024-12-27 | 1020 Murano Bay Dr, Boynton Beach, FL 33435 | - |
| CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2024-11-26 | 1020 Murano Bay Dr, Boynton Beach, FL 33435 | - |
| REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2024-02-01 | 430 32nd Street, West Palm Beach, FL 33407 | - |
| REINSTATEMENT | 2021-09-29 | - | - |
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-09-24 | - | - |
| REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED | 2019-09-09 | Gonzalez, Thomas | - |
| REINSTATEMENT | 2018-10-17 | - | - |
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2018-09-28 | - | - |
| Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSSELL LERMAN, ET AL. VS BINK REALTY, LLC, ET AL. | SC2018-2124 | 2018-12-21 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Russell Lerman |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Leah Lerman |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Pedro L. Demahy, Tiya S. Rolle |
| Name | Jose A. Armstrong |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Sharon Repak Bock |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2019-03-22 |
| Type | Letter-Case |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter-Modified-Case Final |
| Description | ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-MODIFIED-CASE FINAL ~ The Florida Supreme Court has received the following document reflecting a filing date of 03/22/2019.Addendum to the Amended Petition to Issue a Writ of Prohibition--In response to the above addendum, please be advised that the above case is final in this Court and no further pleadings may be filed.The Florida Supreme Court's case number must be utilized on all pleadings and correspondence filed in this cause. |
| Docket Date | 2019-03-22 |
| Type | Miscellaneous Document |
| Subtype | Addendum/Supplement |
| Description | ADDENDUM/SUPPLEMENT ~ ADDENDUM TO THE AMENDED PETITIONTO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2019-03-14 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Amendment/Supplement |
| Description | PETITION-AMENDMENT/SUPPLEMENT ~ Amended Petition to Issue a Writ of Prohibition - Placed with file. |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2019-03-11 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Prohibition DY |
| Description | DISP-PROHIBITION DY ~ Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of prohibition with the Court. To the extent that petitioner seeks review of the Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in Lerman v. Bink Realty, LLC, 232 So. 3d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (table), the petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999). To the extent that petitioner seeks additional relief, the petition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1977). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court. |
| Docket Date | 2019-01-07 |
| Type | Event |
| Subtype | Fee Paid in Full - $300 |
| Description | Fee Paid In Full - $300 |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-27 |
| Type | Letter-Case |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter-New Case |
| Description | ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-27 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Filing Fee Due |
| Description | ORDER-FILING FEE DUE ~ The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Prohibition; however, said petition was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the petition. Petitioner is allowed to and including January 7, 2019, in which to submit the filing fee or a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with sections 57.081 and 57.082, Florida Statutes (2013). The petition will not be submitted to the Court until receipt of the above. Failure to submit the filing fee or the above referenced document to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the petition.Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement. |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-21 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | APPENDIX-PETITION |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-21 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
| Classification | Discretionary Review - Notice to Invoke - Direct Conflict of Decisions |
| Court | Supreme Court of Florida |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 4D17-365 Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502015CA001429XXXXMB |
Parties
| Name | Leah Lerman |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Russell Lerman |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Tiya S. Rolle |
| Name | Jose A. Armstrong |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Pedro L. Demahy |
| Name | HON. PETER D. BLANC, CHIEF JUDGE |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Sharon Repak Bock |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2018-07-06 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Brief Amendment |
| Description | MOTION-BRIEF AMENDMENT ~ Motion to Amend Initial Brief of Appellants |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-11 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Rev DY Lack Juris |
| Description | DISP-REV DY LACK JURIS ~ Having received responses to this Court's order to show cause dated July 2, 2018, the notice of appeal is now being treated as a Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction. This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court and the Court having determined that it should decline to accept jurisdiction, it is ordered that the petition for review is denied.No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R. App. P.9.330(d)(2). |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-11 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Brief Amendment |
| Description | ORDER-BRIEF AMENDMENT DY/STRICKEN ~ Petitioners' Motion to Amend Initial Brief of Appellants is hereby denied as moot. |
| Docket Date | 2018-10-17 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Strike |
| Description | ORDER-STRIKE ~ Appellants' Motion to Vacate the Judgment in the Lower Court Founded on Void Orders by Circuit Court Judges as they Vacated a Prior Circuit Court Judge's Final Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure is hereby stricken as unauthorized. Appellants are hereby advised that this Court will not accept or review any other pleadings related to appellants' motion to strike. |
| Docket Date | 2018-10-01 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | APPENDIX-MOTION ~ Appendix to Appellants' Motion to Vacate the Judgment in the Lower Court Founded on Void Orders by Circuit Court Judges as they Vacated a Prior Circuit Court Judge's Final Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure (Part 1) -- Stricken as unauthorized October 17, 2018 |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-09-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Strike |
| Description | ORDER-STRIKE ~ Appellants' Motion to Strike the Clerk of Court's Erroneous Order Dated on September 18, 2018 is hereby stricken as unauthorized. |
| Docket Date | 2018-09-21 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | APPENDIX-MOTION ~ Appendix to Appellants' Motion to Strike the Clerk of Court's Erroneous Order Dated on September 18, 2018 (Part 1) -- Stricken as unauthorized September 26, 2018 |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-08-14 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Strike |
| Description | ORDER-STRIKE DY ~ Appellants' Motion to Strike the Appellees' Reply to the Appellants' Reply is hereby denied. |
| Docket Date | 2018-09-18 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Strike |
| Description | ORDER-STRIKE ~ Appellants' Typographically Corrected Motion to Vacate a Judgment Obtained by the Appellees Due to a 'Fraud on the Court' that was Committed in Order to Vacate a Mortgage Foreclosure Judgment in the Lower Courts is hereby stricken as unauthorized. |
| Docket Date | 2018-09-12 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Rehearing on Misc Order |
| Description | MOTION-REHEARING ON MISC ORDER ~ Appellants' Typographically Corrected Motion to Vacate a Judgment Obtained by the Appellees Due to a 'Fraud on the Court' that was Committed in Order to Vacate a Mortgage Foreclosure Judgment in the Lower Courts -- Stricken September 18, 2018, as unauthorized. |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-09-11 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | APPENDIX-MOTION ~ Appendix to the Appellants' Motion to Vacate a Judgment Obtained by the Appellees Due to a 'Fraud on the Court' that was Committed in Order to Vacate a Mortgage Foreclosure Judgment in the Lower Courts (Pt. 1) -- Stricken September 18, 2018, as unauthorized. |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-08-06 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Strike |
| Description | MOTION-STRIKE ~ Appellants' Motion to Strike the Appellees' Reply to the Appellants' Reply to the Clerk of Court's Order to Show Cause Dated and Filed on July 28, 2018 to Show Cause to Invoke Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(1)(A)(ii) Because the Lower Courts Invalidated F.S. § § 45.0315 and 702.07 |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-09-07 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Other Substantive |
| Description | ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE DY ~ Appellants' Amended Motion for Reconsideration that Denied Appellants Motion to Strike Appellees' Reply to the Appellants' Reply that was Filed in this Court on August 14, 2018 is hereby denied. |
| Docket Date | 2018-08-20 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Rehearing on Misc Order |
| Description | MOTION-REHEARING ON MISC ORDER ~ Appellants' Amended Motion for Reconsideration that Denied Appellants Motion to Strike Appellees' Reply to the Appellants' Reply that was Filed in this Court on August 14, 2018 |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-08-17 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | APPENDIX-MOTION ~ Appendix to the Appellants' Motion for Reconsideration (2 of 2) |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-08-03 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Reply to Response |
| Description | REPLY TO RESPONSE ~ Appellees' Reply to Appellants' Amended Reply to the Clerk of Court's Order to Show Cause to Invoke Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(1)(A)(iii) as the Lower Courts Had Invalidated Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b), F.S. §§45.0315 and 702.07 |
| On Behalf Of | Bink Realty, LLC |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-27 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response (Amended) |
| Description | RESPONSE (AMD) ~ Appellants' Amended Reply to the Clerk of Court's Order to Show Cause to Invoke Fla. R. App. 9.030(a)(1)(A)(ii)... |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-18 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Other Substantive |
| Description | ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE GR ~ Petitioner's Motion to Amend the Reply to the Clerk of Court's Order to Show Cause Filed on July 13, 2018 is hereby granted. Petitioner is allowed to and including July 30, 2018, in which to file said amended response. All other times will be extended accordingly. |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-16 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Response Amendment |
| Description | MOTION-RESPONSE AMENDMENT ~ Motion to Amend the Reply to the Clerk of Court's Order to Show Cause Filed on July 13, 2018 |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-13 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | RESPONSE ~ Reply to the Clerk of Court's Order to Show Cause -- Amended response filed 7/27/2018. |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-05 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Appendix-Juris |
| Description | APPENDIX-JURIS BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-02 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Show Cause (Appeal Dism Lack Juris) |
| Description | ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (APPEAL DISM LACK JURIS) ~ Appellant's "Notice of Appeal" asserts that the underlying decision of the district court of appeal declares invalid a state statute or provision of the state constitution. However, the Court finds no such declaration explicit in the decision. Appellant is therefore ordered to show cause by July 17, 2018, why his appeal should not be summarily dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, as there appears to be no basis for this case to proceed as an appeal. See art. V, § 3(b)(1)-(2), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(1). Alternatively, appellant may request that his notice of appeal be treated as seeking some different form(s) of this Court's limited jurisdiction. Should appellant pursue this alternative, he must be specific as to which particular form(s) of this Court's limited jurisdiction he is seeking. See art. V, § 3(b)(3)-(10), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(2)-(3). Appellant's response to this order shall be served on or before July 17, 2018. Appellee may serve a reply on or before July 27, 2018.The time for serving the briefs and record pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(j) are hereby tolled. |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-02 |
| Type | Letter-Case |
| Subtype | Letter |
| Description | LETTER ~ With attachment |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-28 |
| Type | Event |
| Subtype | Fee Paid in Full - $300 |
| Description | Fee Paid In Full - $300 |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-28 |
| Type | Letter-Case |
| Subtype | Letter |
| Description | LETTER ~ Letter regarding filing fee |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Filing Fee Due |
| Description | ORDER-FILING FEE DUE ~ The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction in the lower tribunal; however, said notice was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or an order of insolvency from the district court of appeal as required by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.120(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the notice. Petitioner is allowed to and including July 26, 2018, in which to submit the filing fee, or an order of insolvency, or a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with sections 57.081 and 57.082, Florida Statutes (2013). Failure to submit the filing fee or one of the above referenced documents to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the notice.Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement. |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-26 |
| Type | Letter-Case |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter-New Case |
| Description | ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-22 |
| Type | Miscellaneous Document |
| Subtype | Misc. Docket Entry |
| Description | MISC. DOCKET ENTRY |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-20 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction |
| Description | NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT) ~ (FILED AS "NOTICE OF APPEAL") - 12/11/2018: TREATED AS "NOTICE DISCRETIONARY REVIEW" |
| On Behalf Of | Russell Lerman |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-20 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
| Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 2015CA01429XXXXMB |
Parties
| Name | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | LEAH LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Tiya S. Rolle, Kenneth R. Drake, Pete L. Demahy |
| Name | JOSE A. ARMSTRONG |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Hon. Peter D. Blanc |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CLERK |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2019-03-11 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Supreme Court Miscellaneous |
| Description | Supreme Court Disposition ~ SC18-2124 |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-27 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court |
| Description | Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC18-2124 |
| Docket Date | 2018-12-11 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Supreme Court Miscellaneous |
| Description | Supreme Court Disposition ~ SC18-1020 |
| Docket Date | 2018-07-02 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Supreme Court Order |
| Description | Misc. Supreme Court Order ~ SC18-1020 |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-27 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court |
| Description | Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC18-1020 |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-22 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice sent to the Supreme Court |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-21 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ "MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE"**SENT TO SUPREME COURT** |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-20 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice |
| Description | Notice sent to the Supreme Court |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-20 |
| Type | Supreme Court |
| Subtype | Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC |
| Description | Notice of Discretionary Jurisdiction to Supreme Court ~ "NOTICE OF APPEAL" |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2018-06-14 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order |
| Description | Order Denying Reconsideration ~ The motion for reconsideration is denied. Further, this case has been final since February 5, 2018, and the appellant has continued to file numerous motions (six to date), not counting the nine motions filed between the opinion and the mandate. The clerk is directed not to accept any further filings by the appellant in this case. |
| Docket Date | 2018-05-25 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order |
| Description | Motion For Reconsideration |
| Docket Date | 2018-05-23 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that the appellant's May 16, 2018 motion to recall mandate is stricken. The filing of any further duplicative motions may result in the imposition of sanctions. |
| Docket Date | 2018-05-16 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion to Recall Mandate |
| Description | Motion to recall mandate ~ **STRICKEN** |
| Docket Date | 2018-05-10 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the appellant's April 20, 2018 motion to recall mandate is stricken as unauthorized. |
| Docket Date | 2018-04-20 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion to Recall Mandate |
| Description | Motion to recall mandate ~ **STRICKEN** |
| Docket Date | 2018-04-10 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion to Recall Mandate |
| Description | Ord-Denying Recall of Mandate ~ ORDERED that the appellant's March 19, 2018 motion to recall mandate is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2018-03-19 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion to Recall Mandate |
| Description | Motion to recall mandate |
| Docket Date | 2018-03-16 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the appellants' March 12, 2018 motion to vacate is stricken as unauthorized. |
| Docket Date | 2018-03-12 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
| Description | Motion to vacate ~ **STRICKEN** |
| Docket Date | 2018-03-09 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the appellants' February 16, 2018 motion to reverse the unlawfully based judgment is stricken as unauthorized. |
| Docket Date | 2018-02-16 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
| Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO REVERSE THE UNLAWFULLY BASED JUDGMENT... |
| Docket Date | 2018-02-05 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc |
| Description | Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that the appellants' November 27, 2017 motion for rehearing en banc is denied; further, ORDERED that appellants' January 11, 2018 motion for reconsideration and clarification pertaining to this court's January 9, 2018 order is denied. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained; further, ORDERED that appellants' January 16, 2018 motion to strike the appellees' response dated January 12, 2018 to strike appellants' motion for reconsideration and clarification is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2018-02-05 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| Docket Date | 2018-01-16 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Motion To Strike |
| Docket Date | 2018-01-12 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response |
| On Behalf Of | BINK REALTY, LLC |
| Docket Date | 2018-01-11 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order |
| Docket Date | 2018-01-09 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion To Strike |
| Description | Deny Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that the appellants' December 7, 2017 motion to strike is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2017-12-07 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Motion To Strike ~ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR REHEARING. |
| Docket Date | 2017-12-06 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response |
| On Behalf Of | BINK REALTY, LLC |
| Docket Date | 2017-11-27 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion for Rehearing En Banc |
| Description | Motion For Rehearing EN BANC ~ **AMENDED MOTION FILED** |
| Docket Date | 2017-11-20 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion To Strike |
| Description | Deny Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that the appellees' October 31, 2017 motion to strike is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-31 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Motion To Strike |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-30 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response |
| On Behalf Of | BINK REALTY, LLC |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-30 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order |
| Description | Motion For Reconsideration |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-27 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-27 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that the appellants' October 19, 2017 motion for rehearing and request to issue a written opinion is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-25 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response |
| On Behalf Of | BINK REALTY, LLC |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-19 |
| Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
| Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
| Description | Motion For Rehearing |
| Docket Date | 2017-10-05 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Affirmed |
| Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
| Docket Date | 2017-06-06 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-06-06 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | Appendix ~ TO REPLY BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-05-18 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee's Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | BINK REALTY, LLC |
| Docket Date | 2017-05-16 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees' May 3, 2017 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall file the answer brief by May 18, 2017. Failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees' right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. Further ORDERED that appellant's May 4, 2017 motion to strike appellees' motion for extension of time is denied. |
| Docket Date | 2017-05-04 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Motion To Strike ~ APPELLEES' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-05-03 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | BINK REALTY, LLC |
| Docket Date | 2017-04-13 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-03-28 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Record on Appeal |
| Description | Received Records ~ (494 PAGES) |
| Docket Date | 2017-02-07 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Docket Date | 2017-02-06 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-02-06 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
| Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Certiorari |
| Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 502015CA001429XXXXMB |
Parties
| Name | LEAH LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Pete L. Demahy, Tiya S. Rolle |
| Name | JOSE A. ARMSTRONG |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Name | HON. THOMAS H. BARKDULL, I I I |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2017-02-03 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Dismissed - Order by Judge |
| Docket Date | 2017-02-03 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Order-Original Proceeding Dismissed ~ Petitioners’ January 12, 2017 petition for writ of certiorari, and January 23, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus are dismissed for failure to demonstrate entitlement to relief from the December 6, 2016 order. Dismissal is without prejudice to their right to timely appeal a final judgment. GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-23 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
| Description | Appendix to Petition ~ 'TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FORMALLY CERTIORARI' |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-23 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Petition Mandamus |
| Description | Petition Mandamus ~ 'FORMERLY CERTIORARI' |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-23 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Miscellaneous Docket Entry |
| Description | Letter ~ 'CORRECTED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS BEING FILED' |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-13 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Writ of Certiorari / Acknowledgment letter |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-12 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Petition |
| Description | Petition Filed |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-12 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
| Description | Appendix to Petition |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-12 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
| Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 2015CA001429XXXXMB |
Parties
| Name | LEAH LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | JOSE A. ARMSTRONG |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Pete L. Demahy |
| Name | HON. THOMAS H. BARKDULL, I I I |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2017-01-23 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed-Failure to Comply ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this court's December 12, 2016 orders. |
| Docket Date | 2017-01-23 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Dismissed - Order by Clerk |
| Docket Date | 2016-12-12 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Amended Notice of Appeal |
| Docket Date | 2016-12-12 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Docket Date | 2016-12-12 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee - pro se civil appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED, appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee.If appellant has already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, appellant shall file a copy of that order in this court. If appellant does not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believes that he or she is insolvent, appellant shall complete the enclosed application and mail to the Clerk of the Circuit Court within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status, must also be filed with this court. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
| Docket Date | 2016-12-09 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2016-12-09 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | DM:No Fee - Case Dismissed |
| Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Certiorari |
| Court | 4th District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County 15CA01429 |
Parties
| Name | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Name | LEAH LERMAN |
| Role | Petitioner |
| Status | Active |
| Name | JOSE A. ARMSTRONG |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Name | BINK REALTY LLC |
| Role | Respondent |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Pete L. Demahy, JEANNE CRANDALL |
| Name | Hon. Meenu Sasser |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Palm Beach |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2016-04-22 |
| Type | Disposition |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ FOR FAILURE TO ESTABLISH IRREPARABLE HARM. PETITION FOR PROHIBITION DENIED. PETITION FOR ALL WRITS DENIED. |
| Docket Date | 2016-04-22 |
| Type | Disposition by Order |
| Subtype | Dismissed |
| Description | Order-Original Proceeding Dismissed ~ ORDERED that the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for failure to establish irreparable harm. See Williams v. Oken, 62 So. 3d 1129, 1132 (Fla. 2011); Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); further, ORDERED that the petition for writ of prohibition is denied; further, ORDERED that the petition for all writs is denied.STEVENSON, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur. |
| Docket Date | 2016-02-09 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Writ of Certiorari / Acknowledgment letter |
| Docket Date | 2016-02-08 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
| Docket Date | 2016-02-08 |
| Type | Petition |
| Subtype | Petition |
| Description | Petition Filed |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Docket Date | 2016-02-08 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Petition |
| Description | Appendix to Petition |
| On Behalf Of | RUSSELL LERMAN |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2025-01-28 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-02-01 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-01-31 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-02-03 |
| REINSTATEMENT | 2021-09-29 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2020-02-07 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2019-09-09 |
| REINSTATEMENT | 2018-10-17 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2017-01-11 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2016-04-28 |
Date of last update: 01 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
