346280225
|
0418600
|
2022-10-13
|
172 NORMAN CT., INLET BEACH, FL, 32413
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2022-10-13
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2022-11-04 |
Abatement Due Date |
2022-12-02 |
Current Penalty |
5801.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5801.0 |
Final Order |
2022-12-06 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) At 172 Norman Ct. Inlet Beach, FL: On October 13, 2022 at or about 12:20 PM and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities without using fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to approximately 23 feet to the ground below. |
|
|
346063688
|
0418600
|
2022-07-06
|
2015 THOMAS DRIVE, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL, 32401
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2022-07-06
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1916172 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2022-09-06 |
Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2486.0 |
Final Order |
2022-10-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a) 2015 Thomas Drive, Panama City Beach, FL - Northwest Side of Building; On or about July 06, 2022, employee(s) using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to struck-by hazards in that the employer failed to ensure eye protection was being used. |
|
Citation ID |
01002A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2022-09-06 |
Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4351.0 |
Final Order |
2022-10-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest system: a)2015 Thomas Drive, Panama City Beach, FL - West Side of Building; On or about July 06, 2022, employee(s) performing construction activities on a walking/working surface 18 feet above the lower level were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to ensure fall protection was utilized. |
|
Citation ID |
01002B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2022-09-06 |
Abatement Due Date |
2022-09-16 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2022-10-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: a) 2015 Thomas Drive, Panama City Beach, FL - Roof of Building: On or about July 06, 2022, an employee performing construction activities was exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to provide employees with a training program to enable them to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. |
|
Citation ID |
01003A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261053 B12 |
Issuance Date |
2022-09-06 |
Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3108.0 |
Final Order |
2022-10-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails: a) 2015 Thomas Drive, Panama City Beach, FL - Northwest side of Building; On or about July 06, 2022, an employee was working from an aluminum ladder that was placed in a manner that could have caused the employee to contact the 600 volt main electrical service line exposing employees to hazards associated with electrical contact. |
|
Citation ID |
01003B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261060 A |
Issuance Date |
2022-09-06 |
Abatement Due Date |
2022-09-16 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2022-10-03 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: a) 2015 Thomas Drive, Panama City Beach, FL - Construction Site; On or about July 06, 2022, the employer failed to provide a training program for employees to enable them to recognize the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders when employees were required to use ladders on a construction site exposing employees to fall hazards. |
|
|
338916778
|
0419700
|
2013-02-20
|
360 WEST SHORE DR, INLET BEACH, FL, 32413
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Complete
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2013-02-20
|
Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: FALL, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2018-09-19
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2013-04-15 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-05-09 |
Current Penalty |
2400.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
Final Order |
2013-05-13 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about February 20, 2013, on the 6:12 pitch roof, employees installing roofing paper were exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard in that they were not protected by a fall protection system. b. On or about February 20, 2013, in the attic space, employees working in the trusses were exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard in that they were not protected by a fall protection system |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261052 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2013-04-15 |
Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
Final Order |
2013-05-13 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. On or about February 20, 2013, the staircase leading to the attic did not have a stairrail system, exposing employees to a 10 feet fall hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261053 B04 |
Issuance Date |
2013-04-15 |
Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
Final Order |
2013-05-13 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a. On or about February 20, 2013, at the garage eave, a folded step ladder was used to access the roof, exposing employees to a 6 feet fall hazard. |
|
|