| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2016-10-05
|
| Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2022-06-08
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1134755 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-06 |
| Current Penalty |
1282.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
2138.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. A Range Safety Officer was exposed to a noise dose of 87.5%, or an equivalent dBA of 89.0 dBA, which was capable of causing permanent hearing loss. The sampling was performed for 402 minutes during one shift on September 14, 2016. The employer did not have a continuing, effective hearing conservation program. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-06 |
| Current Penalty |
1282.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
2138.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. On or about September 13, 2016, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved full-face and half-face respirators while performing range maintenance and filter change out had not been provided with medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a. On or about September 13, 2016, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved full-face and half-face respirators while performing range maintenance and filter change out had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Current Penalty |
1282.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
2138.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about September 13, 2016, employees used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to solvents, cleaning agents, and lubricants while cleaning firearms at the facility and the employer did not develop or implement at the workplace a written hazard communication program. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about September 13, 2016, employees used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to solvents, cleaning agents, and lubricants while cleaning firearms at the facility and the employer did not provide information and training on the health and physical hazards of these chemicals. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H03 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-02-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a. On or about September 13, 2016, employees used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to solvents, cleaning agents, and lubricants while cleaning firearms at the facility and the employer did not provide an explanation of the new labeling system and safety data sheet. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-16 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
11 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a. On or about September 13, 2016, employees maintaining the shooting range were potentially exposed to lead while monitoring shooters, squeegee and shovel cleaning the range, and ventilation filter change. The employer did not make an initial determination to see if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level. |
|
|
