Inspection Type |
Unprog Rel
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2016-09-28
|
Case Closed |
2016-12-16
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173661 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173686 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1174471 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173494 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173357 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173556 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173671 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173351 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173354 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173506 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about August 26, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear N95 Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators in the workplace. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about August 26, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer failed to provide medical evaluation prior to requiring employees to wear 3M Half Facepiece Respirators in the workplace. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) (Construction Reference 1926.103) On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer failed to ensure fit testing prior to requiring employees to wear 3M Half Facepiece Respirators in the workplace. |
|
Citation ID |
01004A |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about August 26, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees performing painting operations, and who were required to work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Crown Lacquier Thinner Next, Crown Paint Thinner, Klean Strip Denatured Alcohol, Wood Classics FastDry Sanding Sealer, Savogran Superstrip Paint Remover, and Rustoleum Quick Color Aerosol Spray Enamel. |
|
Citation ID |
01004B |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about August 26, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not provide any effective information and training on hazardous chemicals for employees performing painting operations, and who were required to work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Crown Lacquier Thinner Next, Crown Paint Thinner, Klean Strip Denatured Alcohol, Wood Classics FastDry Sanding Sealer, Savogran Superstrip Paint Remover, and Rustoleum Quick Color Aerosol Spray Enamel. |
|
Citation ID |
01005 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19260028 A |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions. On or about August 26, 2016, at the above addressed worksite, where employees are exposed to and required to work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to Crown Lacquier Thinner Next, Crown Paint Thinner, Klean Strip Denatured Alcohol, Wood Classics FastDry Sanding Sealer, Savogran Superstrip Paint Remover, and Rustoleum Quick Color Aerosol Spray Enamel during painting operations, the employer failed to ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate hand protection, such as, but not limited to, chemically impervious gloves. |
|
|
Inspection Type |
Unprog Rel
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2016-08-26
|
Case Closed |
2016-11-17
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173661 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173686 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173357 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173355 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173354 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173351 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173556 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173506 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1173494 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1174471 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about 08/26/2016, at the above addressed worksite, an employee working without a hardhat next to ductwork was exposed to the hazard of a head injury. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-10-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-11-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On or about 08/26/2016, at the above addressed work-site, an employee was exposed to an eye injury while painting without eye protection. |
|
|