| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-07-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2023-07-24
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1922624 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1608796 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B11 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
2610.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
4351.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-08-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toe-boards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) At 1366 Malabar Rd, Palm Bay, FL 32907, Roof: On or about July 19, 2022 times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 11-feet and 10 inches to the lower level, in that employees were not using a fall protection system while engaged in roofing activities on a 6:12 pitched commercial roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-08-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2022-09-20 |
| Current Penalty |
2610.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
4351.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-08-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a) At 1366 Malabar Rd, Palm Bay, FL 32907, Roof: On or about July 19, 2022 times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards 11-feet and 10-inches above ground level, in that employees had not been trained to recognize fall hazards and the measures to mitigate them prior to performing roofing activities. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
2610.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
4351.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-08-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. a) At 1366 Malabar Rd, Palm Bay, FL 32907: On or about July 19, 2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 11-feet and 10-inches to the lower ground level, in that a ladder side rails were not extended at least 3-feet past the roof landing when accessing the roof and ground levels. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-08-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed. a) At 1366 Malabar Rd, Palm Bay, FL 32907: On or about July 19, 2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 11-feet and 10-inches to the lower ground level, in that an A-frame ladder was used to access the top plate of the trusses in the closed position. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-08-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):The top or step of a stepladder was used as a step. a) At 1366 Malabar Rd, Palm Bay, FL 32907: On or about July 19, 2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 11-feet and 10-inches to the lower ground level, in that the top step of the stepladder was used to access the roof and ground levels. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B20 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-08-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20):Employees did not face the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder: a) At 1366 Malabar Rd, Palm Bay, FL 32907: On or about July 19, 2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 11-feet and 10-inches to the lower ground level, in that employees did not face the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-11-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAOF, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2014-01-16
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
748921 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-01-15 |
| Current Penalty |
1400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-02-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about November 21, 2012, employees installing plywood decking on a 6:12 pitched roof were not protected from a 10-foot fall hazard by the use of personal fall arrest, conventional or alternative fall protection system. |
|
|
