Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2016-01-22
|
Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: CHROME6
|
Case Closed |
2016-06-27
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1054408 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1127777 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Shop - the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to coating, hexavalent chromium, lead, acetone, polish, solvent, and compounds. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
Citation ID |
02002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Shop - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to coating, hexavalent chromium, lead, acetone, polish, solvent, and compounds. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
Citation ID |
02003 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100132 D02 |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a. Shop - the employer did not provide a written certification of hazard assessment for personal protective equipment when chemicals such as, but limited to coating, hexavalent chromium, lead, acetone, polish, solvent, and compounds were used. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
Citation ID |
02004 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a. Shop - the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D when dust masks were voluntarily used. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
Citation ID |
02005 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a. Shop - for the employees that performed lead tinning and soldering operations, the employer did not provide an initial determination. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
Citation ID |
02006 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101026 D01 |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): a. Buffing room - for the employees that performed lead tinning and soldering operations, the employer did not provide a determination for the Chromium (VI) 8-hour time-weighted average exposure. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
Citation ID |
02007 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19101026 J01 II |
Issuance Date |
2016-05-12 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-05-18 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2016-06-10 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(j)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that all spills and releases of chromium (VI)-containing material were cleaned up promptly: a. Buffing room - materials containing chromium (VI) on surfaces were not promptly cleaned up. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16. |
|
|