| Inspection Type |
Unprog Rel
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2016-02-10
|
| Emphasis |
L: HINOISE
|
| Case Closed |
2016-08-03
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1123245 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-04-28 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-06-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. On or about February 05, 2016, at the balcony, employees were required to wear a Moldex 2200 N95 particulate respirator while performing forms work or chipping out bad concrete and the employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluation, fit testing to the employee, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-04-28 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-06-15 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-06-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about February 05, 2016, at the balcony, employees were potentially exposed to hazardous materials such as, but not limited to concrete dust containing silica and the employer did not develop nor implement a written hazard communication program. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-04-02
|
| Emphasis |
P: FALL, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2016-07-07
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1051180 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2015-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-08-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about April 2, 2015, at a Starbucks brand commercial restaurant construction site, two employees working in areas where there was the possibility of falling objects were not protected by a helmet and exposed to struck-by type head injuries. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-08-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, fall arrest systems: a. On or about April 2, 2015, at a Starbucks brand commercial restaurant construction site, two employees were installing metal type framing materials from the unprotected edge of a rooftop without fall protection systems in place and exposed to a 17-foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261051 A |
| Issuance Date |
2015-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-08-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: a. On or about April 2, 2015, at a Starbucks brand commercial restaurant construction site, the employer did not provide a stairway or ladder from the lower rooftop to the upper rooftop, therefore two employees had to climb a 48-inch break in vertical elevation and were exposed to slip, trip, and fall hazards to the lower level below and exposed to a vertical opening between the two roof tops that had a 13-foot fall hazard to the lower level. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-08-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. On or about April 2, 2015, at the Starbucks store commercial construction site, two employees used a portable ladder with side rails that did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface of the lower rooftop, exposing the employees to a 13-foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B08 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-08-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder: a. On or about April 2, 2015, at a Starbucks brand commercial restaurant construction site, two employees used a portable ladder that was not secured to prevent accidental displacement by workplace activities or traffic, exposing the employees to a 13-foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
400.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-08-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): a. On or about April 2, 2015, at a Starbucks brand commercial restaurant construction site, two employees, not trained in fall protection, were working from the unprotected edge of a rooftop without fall protection and exposed to a 17-foot fall hazard. |
|
|
