| Entity Name: | FLORES FRAMING LLC |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: |
Florida Limited Liability Co.
FLORES FRAMING LLC is structured as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a common business structure that offers its members limited liability protection, separating their personal assets from the company's debts and obligations. |
| Status: |
Inactive
The business entity is inactive. This status may signal operational issues or voluntary closure, raising concerns about the business's ability to repay loans and requiring careful risk assessment by lenders. |
| Date Filed: | 02 Dec 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Date of dissolution: | 16 Sep 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Last Event: | ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT |
| Event Date Filed: | 16 Sep 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Document Number: | L04000086971 |
| Address: | 7825 LAUREL OAK LANE, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34747 |
| Mail Address: | P O BOX 4652, HAINES CITY, FL, 33845 |
| ZIP code: | 34747 |
| County: | Osceola |
| Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| FLORES ANICETO | Managing Member | 7825 LAUREL OAK LANE, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34747 |
| FLORES ALFREDO | Agent | 7825 LAUREL OAK LANE, HAINES CITY, FL, 33845 |
| FLORES ALFREDO | Managing Member | 7825 LAUREL OAK LANE, KISSIMMEE, FL, 34747 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT | 2005-09-16 | - | - |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| Florida Limited Liability | 2004-12-02 |
| Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 339560955 | 0419700 | 2014-01-13 | 101A ST JOHN'S DRIVE, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL, 32407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citation ID | 01001 |
| Citaton Type | Other |
| Standard Cited | 19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date | 2014-01-30 |
| Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 1600.0 |
| Final Order | 2014-07-29 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 1 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about January 13, 2014, an employee was using a Hitachi pneumatic nail gun without the use of safety glasses. |
| Citation ID | 02001 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date | 2014-01-30 |
| Current Penalty | 1840.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 2800.0 |
| Final Order | 2014-07-29 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 2 |
| Gravity | 10 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about January 13, 2014, employees setting trusses were not protected from a 20 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. |
| Citation ID | 02002 |
| Citaton Type | Serious |
| Standard Cited | 19261053 B05 I |
| Issuance Date | 2014-01-30 |
| Current Penalty | 2000.0 |
| Initial Penalty | 2000.0 |
| Final Order | 2014-07-29 |
| Nr Instances | 1 |
| Nr Exposed | 3 |
| Gravity | 5 |
| FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
| Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support): a. On or about January 13, 2014, on the interior east side of the building, the ladder used to access the 2nd floor was not angled correctly, exposing employees to a 10 feet fall hazard. |
Date of last update: 01 Apr 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
