| Docket Date |
2015-10-15
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
File Destroyed
|
| Description |
File Destroyed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-01-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Returned Records
|
| Description |
Returned Records ~ NO RECORD
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-12-05
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Notice Memorandum
|
| Description |
Notice Memorandum
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-12-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Deny Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-11-11
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ Gr,Ev,Br
|
| On Behalf Of |
PATRICK E. SULLIVAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-10-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Grant Att Fees-Remand to JCC 60d fr Mand ~ AE'S 7/19MOT ATTYS FEES IS PROVISIONALLY GRANTED SHOULD AE ULITMATELY BE DETERMINED TO BE PREVAILING PARTY BELOW. IF SO DETERMINED, LOWER COURT SHALL DETERMINE AND ASSESS REASONABLE ATTYS FESS FOR THIS APPEALCOURT PROCEEDING. SEE FRAP 9.400(a)&(b). AE'S 7/19MOT ATTYS FEES AS SANCTIONS, IS DENIED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-10-26
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ LACK OF JURISDICTION
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-10-26
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Order Dismissing Appeal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-08-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-DISPENSING ORAL ARGUMENT ~ W/I 10 DYS, REQ FOR RECONSIDERATION MAY BE FILED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-08-05
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
PATRICK E. SULLIVAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ DISPENSE W/ OA
|
| On Behalf Of |
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-07-19
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief w/Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-06-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Initial Brief w/Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
PATRICK E. SULLIVAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-06-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Motion to Dismiss
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-05-25
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
PATRICK E. SULLIVAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-05-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-05-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ APPEAL SHALL PROCEED AS A NON-FINAL APPEAL. HOWEVER, INASMUCH AS THE ORDER BEING APPEALED APPEARS TO BE NON-APPEALABLE AND IN LIGHT OF THE ARGUMENTS AS TO WHY THE ORDER IS APPEALABLE IN AA'S NOA; BOTH PARTIES SHALL ADDRESS THIS COURT'S JURISDICTION IN THEIR BRFS.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-05-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
Order to pay filing fee - Civil appeal (300)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-05-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ D.S.
|
| On Behalf Of |
PATRICK E. SULLIVAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-05-04
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
