| Docket Date |
2023-02-17
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 13, 2023 motion for rehearing or written opinion is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-13
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Prevailing ~ ORDERED that appellee’s July 25, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellee is the prevailing party and, if so, setting the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including but not limited to preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-29
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-24
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-25
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-25
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's July 20, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before July 25, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ AMENDED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee's July 20, 2022 motion for extension is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 15 DAYS TO 7/21/22.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 7/6/22.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 45 DAYS TO 6/6/22.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-24
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ 2ND AMENDED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant's amended appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not fully text searchable, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN** AMENDED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not fully text searchable, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-22
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-22
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-22
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ Upon consideration of Appellee’s March 7, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Appellant’s February 23, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted in part, and the record is supplemented to include only Appellant’s Memorandum of Law Opposing Appellee’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order. The motion to supplement the record is denied in part as to Appellant’s Response to Appellee’s Statement of Material Facts and Statement of Additional Material and Disputed Facts. See Cotton v. State, 177 So. 3d 666, 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (stating that courts “are not at liberty to add to this record documents that were never filed with the lower tribunal in this case and that there is no evidence the trial court reviewed.”) (citing Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s March 9, 2022 motion for leave to file reply is denied. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(a).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that the notification the parties received by email from this court on February 23, 2022, regarding a notice of agreed extension of time was sent in error. The operative notice of agreed extension is appellant's January 31, 2022 notice, in which the parties agreed to an extension through March 5, 2022. The court also notes, however, that appellant's February 23, 2022 motion to supplement the record remains pending.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ **PROPOSED** (44 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-23
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 3/5/22.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 11, 572 pages
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 2/3/22
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-29
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charter Schools USA at Hollywood, L.C.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-27
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-27
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Pacific National Bank
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
