Docket Date |
2018-01-26
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-10
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part
|
Description |
Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part - Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-11-08
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-08-01
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES.
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-24
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ *RESPONSE FILED 8/1/17*
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-24
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-24
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-06-21
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Reply Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief ~ 30 DAYS TO 7/30/17.
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-06-08
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's May 30, 2017 order is amended as follows: ORDERED that appellee's (Sunil Khetarpal) May 18, 2017 motion to supplement the record is denied, and the proposed supplemental records are stricken from the docket.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-06-05
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-05-31
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 18, 2017 motion to supplement the record is denied, and the proposed supplemental records are stricken from the docket.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-05-24
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION AND OBJECTION TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD.
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-05-18
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records ~ ***STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET. SEE 5/31/17 ORDER. **
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-05-18
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-04-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 20 DAYS TO 5/21/17
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-04-21
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 10 DAYS TO 5/1/17.
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-03-22
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 30 DAYS TO 4/21/17
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-02-21
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 30 DAYS TO 3/22/17.
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-01-23
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-01-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
Description |
Order Denying Motion For Review ~ ORDERED that appellee’s December 27, 2016 motion for review of order denying a stay is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-01-03
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-01-03
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
Description |
Appendix to Response
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-01-03
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief ~ 21 DAYS TO 1/21/17.
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-12-27
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
Description |
Motion For Review
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-12-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 30, 2016 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief by December 31, 2016. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-12-07
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Objection
|
Description |
Objection ~ (RESPONSE) TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.
|
On Behalf Of |
SUNIL KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-11-30
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-10-26
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief ~ 30 DAYS TO 12/1/16.
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-10-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's October 20, 2016 motion to supplement the record is granted. The proposed supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-10-24
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-10-21
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ (5096 PAGES)
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-10-20
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-08-15
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-08-12
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
MICHELLE KHETARPAL
|
|
Docket Date |
2016-08-12
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-26
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-10
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Family Law ~ ORDERED that the appellant's July 24, 2017 motion for appellate fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellant should be awarded fees under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2016) and, if so, the amount appropriate for this appellate case. In determining whether to award fees, the trial court should consider financial need and ability and any other factor necessary to do justice and equity between the parties, pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997). If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|