Docket Date |
2019-05-08
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL - 76 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-07
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court ~ Pursuant to this Court’s order dated December 14, 2020, the “Amended Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction of Supreme Court” has been treated as a Motion for Reinstatement, and said motion is hereby stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-12-14
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ This case is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review anunelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinionor explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending reviewin, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla.2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v.Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla.1987); Dodi Publ’g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkinsv. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980).No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby deniedas moot.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-12-11
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-12-01
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-11-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
Description |
ORD-DENYING REHEARING
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-11-02
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ to appellee motion
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-26
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING AND OPINION
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-23
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
Description |
Motion For Rehearing ~ and opinion
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-09
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's motion to supplement the record is denied with respect to items S1b - S7b, 8b (in part) and 10b -13b. Items 8b (in part), 9b and 14b are already included in the appellate record.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-05
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ TO APPELLEE'S MOTION
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-30
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-30
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ for leave to respond
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-22
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Oral Argument Date Set
|
Description |
Oral Argument Date Set ~ Tampa
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-21
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ **SEE ORDER DATED 10/6/2020**
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-21
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-11
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Appendix/Attachment to Notice
|
Description |
Appendix/Attachment to Notice
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-07-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Re: Video Oral Argument
|
Description |
OA Notice Video ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2020, at 9:30 A.M., before: Judge Patricia J. Kelly, Judge Edward C. LaRose, Judge Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim. To mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak while continuing with the orderly processing of cases, the oral argument will be conducted by video conference. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to sign in by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website.Within ten days from the date of this order, any attorney or party who will be presenting argument is requested to provide the Clerk of the Court with the email address where the video invitation should be sent and a telephone number. This information may be sent by email to 2dcaClerk@flcourts.org. The Clerk will provide connection instructions to each participant before the argument.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-06-26
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
Description |
Deny Stay-52 ~ Appellant’s emergency petition for motion to stay further proceedings for injunction and requested relief is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-06-25
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
Description |
Emergency Motion To Stay ~ FURTHER PROCEEDINGS FOR INJUNCTION AND REQUESTED RELIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-05-06
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 3RD SUPPLEMENTAL - REDACTED - 44 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record-30f ~ Appellant's second amended motion to supplement record is denied as unnecessary. Appellant should consult the circuit court clerk to determine what arrangements need to be made to supplement the record as authorized by this court's April 6, 2020, order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-09
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Reply Brief
|
Description |
Amended Appellant Reply Brief ~ 2ND AMENDED REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-09
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record ~ 2ND AMENDED MOTION
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-06
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Reply Brief
|
Description |
Amended Appellant Reply Brief ~ ADDENDUM TO AMENDED APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-06
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ The reply brief filed on April 2, 2020, is stricken. Appellant's emergency motion for an extension of time is granted to the extent that the amended reply brief is accepted as filed. Appellant's motion to supplement the record is granted in part and denied in part. With respect to items SR1, SR8, and SR9, the motion is denied without prejudice to filing an amended motion to supplement the record with these items demonstrating that they were before the lower tribunal. The motion is otherwise granted with respect to items SR2 through SR7 and SR10-SR14. Appellant shall make arrangements within three days with the clerk of the circuit court for the supplementation of the record with the items mentioned in the motion, with the supplemental record to be filed in this court within twenty-five days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-03
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-03
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Reply Brief
|
Description |
Amended Appellant Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-03
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record ~ amended
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-02
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-02
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-26
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-26
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ EMERGENCY
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant’s motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served within 15 days from the date of this order. Further motions for an extension of time to serve the reply brief will not be entertained.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-03
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-03
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S FOURTH MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-03
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-02-03
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served within thirty days of the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-01-30
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-01-30
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-01-29
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-01-02
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Answer Brief
|
Description |
Amended Appellee Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-31
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Grant Motion to Strike ~ The appellant's motion to strike is granted. The answer brief and its appendix are hereby stricken.The appellee shall serve an amended answer brief within 45 days of the date of this order. Any appendix material must reproduce only documents in the record filed with the clerk of the circuit court, see Altchiler v. State, Dept. of Professional Regulation, Div. of Professions, Bd. of Dentistry, 442 So. 2d 349, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and, further, included in the record on appeal transmitted to this court, see Crabtree v. Rogers, 364 So. 2d 106, 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) ("Thus it is apparent that the record prescribed by Rule 9.200 must be prepared and filed. Nowhere in that rule is an appendix authorized in lieu of a record."). Additionally, a brief's citations to the record in a final appeal must be to formal record, not an appendix. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(3), (c). During the 45-day period authorized in the previous paragraph, the appellee may seek to supplement the record by motion filed in this court. In light of the rulings herein, the appellant's motion for extension of time to serve the reply brief is denied as premature.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-26
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
Description |
ORD-TO FILE RESPONSE ~ Appellee is directed to respond within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order to appellant’s “motion to strike/correct appellee answer brief index.”
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-23
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-23
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Motion To Strike ~ CORRECT APPELLEE ANSWER BRIEF INDEX
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-11-22
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall beserved within 30 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-11-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-11-15
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Accept Brief as Timely
|
Description |
GR T/ACCEPT BRF FILED AS TIMELY ~ Appellant's motion to accept initial brief as timely is granted, and the initial brief is accepted as timely filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-18
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee Answer Brief ~ Stricken
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-17
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Briefs
|
Subtype |
Motion to Accept Brief as Timely
|
Description |
Motion To Accept Timely Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-17
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-11
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-01
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Denying EOT for Initial Brief ~ Appellant's motion for an extension of time is denied. Appellant shall serve theinitial brief within ten days of the date of this order or this appeal will be subject todismissal without further notice.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Denying EOT for Initial Brief ~ ***AMENDED - SEE 10/1/19 AMENDED ORDER***Appellant's motion for an extension of time is denied. Appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten days of the date of this order or this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-20
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-08-22
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
grant eot for IB - unlikely ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 30 days. However, further motions for extension of time are unlikely to receive favorable consideration. Appellant's reply is stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-08-14
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Reply
|
Description |
REPLY ~ APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO EXTENSION OF TIME
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-08-08
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
On Behalf Of |
H. A. W.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-08-07
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-18
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-05-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-05-02
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-04-08
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 340 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-04-03
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-03-18
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-18
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ HELINGER - 2183 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-01-25
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-12-03
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Deny EOT (General)-74d ~ The appellant's motion for extension of time is denied as premature. In future motions for extension of time, the appellant should request a specific number of days or deadline date.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-30
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-05
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
fee - civil; pro se
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-02
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ PATERNITY
|
On Behalf Of |
M. T. S.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-02
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|