|
341950830
|
0418800
|
2016-12-02
|
8027 NW 71 STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33166
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2017-05-26
|
| Case Closed |
2017-08-08
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1160585 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-06-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-27 |
| Current Penalty |
253.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
253.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used: On or May 26, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not ensure fit testing was provided for employees who are required to wear Moldex 2300 N95 Particulate Respirators. The employer was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety And Health standard or its equivalent standard, 1910.134(f)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection #908811, Citation 2, Item 3, and was affirmed as a final order on December 16, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 8027 NW 71st Street, Miami FL 33166. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 G01 I A |
| Issuance Date |
2017-06-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On or about May 26, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer allowed employees who are required to wear Moldex 2300 N95 Particulate Respirators to have facial hair which interfered with the seal of the facepiece. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 K03 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-06-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: On or May 26, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not provide effective respiratory protection training prior to requiring the employees to wear Moldex 2300 N95 Particulate Respirators. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-06-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
63 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about May 26, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not provide effective information and training for employees who are exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Isocyanates, MEK, Iron Oxide Fumes, Lacquer Thinner and Mineral Spirits. |
|
|
|
339103657
|
0418800
|
2013-06-06
|
8027 NW 71 STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33166
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Unprog Rel
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-06-06
|
| Emphasis |
N: AMPUTATE
|
| Case Closed |
2014-09-23
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
822380 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
908811 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-14 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-08-28 |
| Current Penalty |
1750.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3500.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-08-27 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about June 6, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to an amputation hazard while working with a chop saw (SCWC 0041) that lacked point of operation guarding. b. On or about June 6, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to an amputation hazard while working with a drill press (EE1 Portugal, Model DG-2, Serial number 1-9004) that lacked point of operation guarding. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 B |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-14 |
| Current Penalty |
892.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
1785.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-08-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: a. On or about June 6, 2013, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a drill press (EE1 Portugal, Model DG-2, Serial number 1-9004) that was not anchored. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100243 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-14 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-08-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-08-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) were used on portable grinder(s) which were not provided with safety guard(s) meeting the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1) through (c)(4): a. On or about June 6, 2013, at the above addressed worksite, an employee was exposed to an amputation hazard while working with an angle grinder (Hitachi #C67552) that lacked a guard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100303 C03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-14 |
| Current Penalty |
1400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-08-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(c)(3)(i): All splices and joints and the free ends of the conductors were not covered with an insulation equivalent to that of the conductors or with an insulating device identified for the purpose: a. On or about June 6, 2013, at the above addressed worksite, an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard while working in close proximity of a spliced cord which was part of a food heating cabinet that was not properly insulated. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 G02 III |
| Issuance Date |
2013-08-14 |
| Current Penalty |
1050.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2100.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-08-27 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. On or about June 6, 2013, at the above addressed worksite, an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard while working with an extension cord that lacked strain relief at the female end attachment plug. |
|
|
|
339088114
|
0418800
|
2013-05-29
|
8027 NW 71 STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33166
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2013-05-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: FORKLIFT, L: METHCHLO, N: CHROME6
|
| Case Closed |
2014-01-04
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
820527 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
910365 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
910824 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 K03 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-12-20 |
| Current Penalty |
1575.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1575.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-01-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
27 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3): The employer did not ensure that each employee exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels was trained and informed of the information included in sections k(3)(i) through k(3)(iii). On or about May 29, 2013 the employer at the above addressed jobsite, did not ensure employees are informed about the effects of noise on hearing, hearing protection, and audiometric testing. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101026 L02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-11-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-01-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i): The employer did not provide training and information to ensure that employees could demonstrate knowledge of chromium (VI) standard, and the purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program: On or about May 29, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer at the above addressed worksite, did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the chromium (VI) standard in regards to the work practices and personal protective equipment requirements. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101052 K01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-12-20 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-01-06 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
51 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii): The employer did not include methylene chloride in the hazard communication program established to comply with hazard communication standard (HCS) (1910.1200) and did not ensure each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section: On or about May 29, 2013 the employer at the above addressed worksite, did not include methylene chloride in the hazard communication program for employees using STA PUT S200 a spray adhesive that contains 35-60% methylene chloride. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-12-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
27 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: On or about May 29, 2013, the employer at the above addressed worksite, did not provide audiograms to employees with exposure that exceeded a TWA of 85 decibels in the metal fabrication and shipping departments. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-12-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
17 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about May 29, 2013, the employer, at the above addressed worksite, did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to wear tight-fitting respirator while performing tasks that include, but are not limited to, painting, spraying adhesive, and/or polishing metal. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F02 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-12-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
17 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about May 29, 2013 , the employer at the above addressed jobsite, did not provide fit testing to employees required to wear a tight fitting respirator in order perform work duties such as, but not limited to, welding, painting, spraying adhesive, and/or polishing metal. |
|
| Citation ID |
02004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101026 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-12-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): On or about May 29, 2013, the employer, at the above addressed worksite, did not determine the time weighted average (TWA) of each employee exposed to hexavalent chromium while performing hot welding work on chromium containing metal, stainless steel. |
|
| Citation ID |
02005 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101052 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-12-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine each employee's exposure to methylene chloride: On or about May 29, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer at the above addressed worksite, did not perform air monitor of employees who use spray adhesive STA PUT S2000, which contains 35-60% methylene chloride, during work activites. |
|
|
