| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
18-37122
|
Parties
| Name |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Daniel Foodman, Eduardo J. Casal
|
|
| Name |
SANDRA SCHWEMMER, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
MICHAEL STARY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
LUIS S. KONSKI, VICTOR A. RUIZ, ANA E. TOVAR, Patricia Gladson
|
|
| Name |
HON. MARK BLUMSTEIN
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-07-06
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-06
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO RESPONDENT'S RESPONSEIN OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR REHEARINGEN BANC OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A WRITTEN OPINION
|
| On Behalf Of |
MICHAEL STARY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE INOPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR REHEARINGEN BANC OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A WRITTEN OPINION
|
| On Behalf Of |
MICHAEL STARY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-27
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC OR,IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A WRITTEN OPINION
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Prohibition Denied (Including Resp & Reply) (DA32) ~ Upon consideration, Petitioners’ Motion for Review of Order Denying Stay is hereby denied. Following review of the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO PETITIONERS' MOTIONFOR REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Motion For Review ~ PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR REVIEWOF ORDER DENYING STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
REPLY ~ REPLY TO RESPONDENT MICHAEL STARY'S RESPONSE INOPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-06
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONDENT MICHAEL STARY'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITIONTO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
MICHAEL STARY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Respond to Petition
|
| Description |
Order a Response - Prohibition (OR12K) ~ The party, if any, opposing the relief requested in the Petition for Writ of Prohibition shall, and the respondent judge may, file a response within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order to the Petition for Writ of Prohibition. This Order does not stay further proceedings in the lower tribunal. Further, a reply may be filed five (5) days thereafter. MILLER, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-17
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Prohibition
|
| Description |
Petition Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion Extension of Time To Reply To Response
|
| Description |
Motion Extension of TimeTo Reply To Respons ~ PETITIONERS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
GEMINI INVESTORS, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Treat EnBanc as Incl. Reh. & Deny(OD57H) ~ Upon consideration, Petitioners’ Motion for Rehearing En Banc or, in the Alternative, for a Written Opinion is treated as having included a motion for rehearing. The motion for rehearing or, in the alternative, for a written opinion is denied. The Motion for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Ext-granted to reply to response on pet. (OG01D) ~ Petitioners’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file a reply to the Response to the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is granted to and including April 19, 2022.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-06
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
MICHAEL STARY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-18
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments.
|
|
|
