Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502021CA000080
|
Parties
Name |
Henry Olmino
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Joel David Lucoff
|
|
Name |
LOVE LANTANA POINT LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Gavin Tudor Elliot
|
|
Name |
Hon. Gerard Joseph Curley Jr.
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Palm Beach Clerk
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2024-10-31
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
Description |
Notice of Filing
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-30
|
Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
On Behalf Of |
Henry Olmino
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-08
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-08
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-04
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's October 31, 2024 filing, the above-styled appeal is dismissed as untimely filed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); see also Gulley v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 101 So. 3d 949 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (dismissing appellate proceeding that was not initiated within the applicable time limit); Epicor Software Corp. v. Coopers & Clarke, Inc., 928 So. 2d 1249, 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that "jurisdictional time limits such as the time for filing a notice of appeal or a motion for a new trial, may not be extended for any reason") (quoting Bank One, N.A. v. Batronie, 884 So. 2d 346, 349 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)).
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2024), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. ORDERED that Appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal - see the court's website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection. **NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-15
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
The court has received the Notice of Appeal in the above-styled case and finds, from the face of the Notice, that the appeal appears to be untimely filed. The Notice was filed in the Lower Tribunal on October 7, 2024, and the Notice reflects August 30, 2024, as the date of the order being appealed. ORDERED that Appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order(s) being appealed and any subsequent orders which tolled the time for the filing of the Notice of Appeal. Said orders must reflect the time/date stamp so that timeliness can be determined. ORDERED that failure to comply with this order will result in the sua sponte dismissal of the above-styled case as being an untimely appeal.
|
View |
View File
|
|
|