|
344203708
|
0419700
|
2019-07-30
|
704 WEST HIGHWAY 90, BONIFAY, FL, 32425
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2019-08-02
|
| Emphasis |
L: HINOISE, N: CHROME6, P: HINOISE
|
| Case Closed |
2020-05-28
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-01-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a) On or about August 2, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 to employees that were permitted to use of respirators was voluntary. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100179 B05 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5): The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane: a) On or about August 2, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer failed to ensure that the bridge crane located next to the southern or front wall of the building was marked with the rated load. b) On or about August 2, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer failed to ensure that the radial arm crane located in the CNC area of the building was marked with the rated load. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100179 J01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(1)(i): Prior to initial use, all new and altered cranes were not inspected to insure compliance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.179(j). a) On or about August 2, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer did not inspect the bridge crane used by the employees, located next to the southern or front wall of the building, before initial use. b) On or about August 2, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer did not inspect the radial arm crane used by the employees, located in the CNC area of the building, before initial use. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100179 J03 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2019-12-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section: a) On or about August 2, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer failed to perform periodic inspections to ensure that the bridge crane located next to the southern or front wall of the building was safe to operate. b) On or about August 2, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer failed to perform periodic inspections to ensure that the radial arm crane located in the CNC area of the building was safe to operate. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101020 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-01-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1): Employees covered by 29 CFR 1910.1020 were not informed, upon entering employment and at least annually thereafter, of the existence, location, availability of any records covered by this section, of the identity of the person responsible for maintaining and providing access to records, or of each employee's right of access to these records: a) On or about August 2, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to provided with the information to the employees on the existence, location, availability of medical and safety records and any records covered by this section. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2020-01-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-12-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. a) On or about August 2, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to compile a list of all chemicals stored and used in the workplace for the employees' information. |
|
|
|
337809610
|
0419700
|
2012-12-11
|
704 WEST HIGHWAY 90, BONIFAY, FL, 32425
|
|
| Inspection Type |
FollowUp
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-12-11
|
| Emphasis |
L: FORKLIFT, N: AMPUTATE
|
| Case Closed |
2013-11-22
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
513338 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
|
|
335133385
|
0419700
|
2012-07-11
|
704 WEST HIGHWAY 90, BONIFAY, FL, 32425
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2012-07-11
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, N: CHROME6, N: AMPUTATE, L: FORKLIFT
|
| Case Closed |
2013-11-22
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
436230 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 L01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer had not ensured that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l) [Reference 29 CFR 1926.602(d) for construction]: a. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were using a Nissan Forklift to move fabricated metal parts throughout the shop area were not provided with formal instruction and an evaluation of the operators' performance prior to using the Nissan Forklift. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: a. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards because Summit horizontal lathe chuck was not guarded. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(i): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from sustaining an injury where the work was actually performed upon the material being processsed: a. On or about July 11, 2011, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard because the milling chuck on Lacun Republic milling machine was not guarded. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 A04 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: a. On or about July 11, 2011, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, work rest on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on left hand side of workbench was greater than eighth-inch in distance. b. On or about July 11, 2011, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, work rest on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on right hand side of workbench was greater than eighth-inch in distance. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 B09 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch. a. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, safety guard on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on left hand side of the workbench was greater than one-fourth-inch in distance. b. On or about July 11, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard, safety guard on Balder Electric Company grinding machine on right hand side of the workbench was greater than one-fourth-inch in distance. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will met: a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not develop and implement the written hazard communication program which described how requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to TRIM SC520 cutting fluid, Dynaflux Enviro-Spat, and welding gas. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 F05 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a. a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to TRIM SC520 in the workplace was labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 F05 II |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a. a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to TRIM SC520 in the workplace was labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about July 11, 2012, the employer did not provide effective information and training to employees on the hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to TRIM SC520 cutting fluid, Dynaflux Enviro-Spat, and welding gas in their work area. |
|
|
