| Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED that appellants’ February 22, 2021 motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 8, 2020 decision is stricken as unauthorized. This is appellants’ third such motion. “A party shall not file more than 1 motion for rehearing, clarification, certification, or written opinion with respect to a particular order or decision of the court.” Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(b). Accordingly, the Court has not considered the instant motion, nor will it docket future motions for reconsideration of the October 8, 2020 decision.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that appellants' March 3, 2021 reply to response is stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ COPY OF THE PROPOSED NON-EXECUTED, NO-AGREED AND UNENFORCEABLE RELEASE OF CLAIMS THROUGH THE MDL ACTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Motion For Reconsideration ~ **STRICKEN** RECONSIDERATION MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRITTEN OPINION ON THIS COURT'S DECISION, AND MOTION FOR THE COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that appellants' January 26, 2021 motion for reconsideration is stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellees’ January 29, 2021 response is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ AMENDED RESPONSE TO "APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN EXPLANATION OF THIS COURT DECISION"
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Motion For Reconsideration ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellants’ November 30, 2020 amended motion for rehearing en banc or written opinion is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-30
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ AMENDED MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRITTEN EXPLANATIONOPINION, AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FORREHEARING EN BANC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-23
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ **AMENDED MOTION FILED** MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRITTEN EXPLANATION OPINION,AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-16
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ SC20-1661 DISMISSED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice sent to the Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice of Discretionary Jurisdiction to Supreme Court
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-30
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-30
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Unconditionally ~ ORDERED that appellees’ April 17, 2020 motion for award of appellate attorneys’ fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-09-29
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilfort Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that appellants' reply brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that it exceeds fifteen (15) pages. An amended brief in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-02
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilfort Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-17
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-17
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-17
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 04/17/2020
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-25
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 2115 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-24
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ "NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH FILING FEES"
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-18
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellant's Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilfort Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Notice of Inability to Transmit Record on Appeal filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on January 8, 2020, appellants are ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment for and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellants' February 6, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall file the amended initial brief within seven (7) days from the current due date.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-06
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE THE AMENDED BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that the appellants' January 28, 2020 initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that it exceeds the page limit. An amended brief in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The time for any responsive briefing shall be tolled until service of this amended brief.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-27
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants in the above-styled case are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellants’ initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellants’ November 18, 2019 response, this court’s November 8, 2019 order to show cause is discharged. Further,ORDERED that the motion for extension of time, contained in the response, is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-18
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ AND TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ **DISCHARGED**ORDERED that appellants in the above-styled case are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the appellants' initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Boynton Beach Associates XVI, LLLP
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Magdadene Dieuvil
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-29
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee - pro se civil appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED, appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal - see the court's website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee.If appellant has already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, appellant shall file a copy of that order in this court. If appellant does not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believes that he or she is insolvent, appellant shall complete the enclosed application and mail to the Clerk of the Circuit Court within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status, must also be filed with this court. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-28
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilfort Dieuvil
|
|
