Docket Date |
2021-07-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that appellant's July 19, 2021 letter is stricken as unauthorized, as this case was dismissed in this court on March 15, 2021.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-19
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ **STRICKEN**
|
On Behalf Of |
William Ross
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-16
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
Description |
Motion For Rehearing ~ **STRICKEN**
|
On Behalf Of |
William Ross
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 16, 2021 motion is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the appellee with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the appellee. Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the appellee within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-04-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's letters dated April 1, 2021 are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the appellee with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the appellee. Appellant may re-file the documents with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the appellee within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-04-05
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
Description |
Letter ~ **STRICKEN** HAND WRITTEN DATED 4/1/21.
|
On Behalf Of |
William Ross
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-15
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
ORD-Granting Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ ORDERED that appellee’s January 19, 2021 motion to dismiss is granted. See Harris v. Ferne L. Graves Trust, 893 So. 2d 602, 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (dismissing the appeal as untimely where the circuit court denied the appellant’s motion to reopen and the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on the motion to reopen because the motion for reconsideration did not postpone the time to file an appeal).WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-15
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-05
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice
|
Description |
Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT ROA
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-02-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
Description |
ORD-Appellant to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellee’s January 19, 2021 motion to dismiss.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-19
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Braun
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-19
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Braun
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-19
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Braun
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED, sua sponte, that this appeal shall proceed as to the September 1, 2020 order denying the appellant's July 15, 2020 motion to reopen.WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.MAY, J., dissents.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-11-12
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
|
Description |
Determination of Indigent Status
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-11-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
Description |
ORD-Reinstatement ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of the granting of appellant’s determination of indigent status, the filing fee is waived and the above-styled appeal is reinstated. All time frames shall run from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-28
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk ~ **REINSTATED**
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-28
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-No Filing Fee ~ **REINSTATED** ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for non-payment of the $300.00 filing fee.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-07
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
Description |
Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the "order denying motion to reopen" is an appealable order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110 or 9.130. Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So. 2d 371, 375 (Fla. 2002) (explaining that a final judgment is one which ends the litigation between the parties and disposes of all issues involved such that no further action by the court will be necessary); Marina Bay Hotel and Club, Inc. v. McCallum, 733 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that appellate courts must narrowly interpret Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 so as to "restrict the number of appealable non-final orders"). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-05
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
Description |
Letter ~ WITH APPLICATION FOR CIVIL INDIGENCE ATTACHED.
|
On Behalf Of |
William Ross
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
Description |
Appellant to File Order Appealed-Civil ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order being appealed. See Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(d). This copy must contain a legible stamp from the clerk of the lower tribunal, showing the date and time the order being appealed was filed in that office.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-21
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-18
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
William Ross
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-18
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
WV:Waived
|
|