| Docket Date |
2016-10-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Authority Stricken
|
| Description |
ORDER-SUPP AUTHORITY STRICKEN ~ Petitioner's Notice of Supplemental Authority does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.225 and is hereby stricken. Rule 9.225 does not permit argument in a notice of supplemental authority and does not list a report as an item that may be filed as a supplemental authority.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-10-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdiction Accepted
|
| Description |
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED ~ In Disposition Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-10-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY ~ Amended Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
SERGIO RAMIREZ
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-10-27
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Rev Gr Merits (Quash & Remand) (Tag)
|
| Description |
DISP-REV GR MERITS (QUASH & REMAND) (TAG) ~ Upon review of the response and reply to the Court's Order to Show Cause dated June 29, 2016, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the First District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016). No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-10-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY ~ *Stricken 10/13/2016: Rule 9.225 does not permit argument in a notice of supplemental authority and does not list a report as an item that may be filed as a supplemental authority.
|
| On Behalf Of |
SERGIO RAMIREZ
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-25
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Appendix-Response
|
| Description |
APPENDIX-RESPONSE ~ APPENDIX TO PETITIONER'S REPLY TO RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
SERGIO RAMIREZ
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-25
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
MOTION-ATTORNEYS FEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
SERGIO RAMIREZ
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
JORDA ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-06-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause (Tag-Reverse/Quash)
|
| Description |
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH) ~ The employer respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before July 14, 2016, why this Court should not accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 2016 WL 3191086 (Fla. Jun. 9, 2016). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before July 25, 2016.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-21
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Paid in Full
|
| Description |
Fee Paid in Full
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-21
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Letter
|
| Description |
LETTER ~ DATED 07/16/2015 WITH FILING FEE
|
| On Behalf Of |
SERGIO RAMIREZ
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Stay Proceedings FSC (Tag Case)
|
| Description |
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE) ~ The proceedings in this Court in the above case are hereby stayed pending disposition of Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, Case No. SC13-1930, and City of St. Petersburg v. Westphal, Case No. SC13-1976 which are pending in this Court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-16
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Filing Fee Due
|
| Description |
ORDER-FILING FEE DUE ~ The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction in the lower tribunal; however, said notice was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or an order of insolvency from the district court of appeal as required by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.120(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the notice. Petitioner is allowed to and including August 17, 2015, in which to submit the filing fee, or an order of insolvency, or a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with sections 57.081 and 57.082, Florida Statutes (2013). Failure to submit the filing fee or one of the above referenced documents to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the notice.Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-07-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
| On Behalf Of |
SERGIO RAMIREZ
|
|
