| Entity Name: | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
| Filing Type: | Foreign Profit Corporation |
| Status: | Active |
| Date Filed: | 23 Dec 1992 (32 years ago) |
| Document Number: | F92000000884 |
| FEI/EIN Number | 43-1623092 |
| Address: | 715 KIRK DRIVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 |
| Mail Address: | PO BOX 412197, KANSAS CITY, MO 64141 |
| Place of Formation: | DELAWARE |
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| COGENCY GLOBAL INC. | Agent |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| DENSON, CRAIG W | Treasurer | 715 KIRK DRIVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| DENSON, CRAIG W | Secretary | 715 KIRK DRIVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Beshoner, Benjamin C. | Asst. Secretary | 715 KIRK DRIVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Slimp, Robert J. | President | 191 Peachtree St., NE, Ste. 3300 Atlanta, GA 30303 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Slimp, Robert J. | Chairman | 191 Peachtree St., NE, Ste. 3300 Atlanta, GA 30303 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Slimp, Robert J. | Director | 191 Peachtree St., NE, Ste. 3300 Atlanta, GA 30303 |
| O'Grady, Thomas D | Director | 6300 Sprint Parkway, Ste. 300, Overland Park, KS 66211 |
| Mann, Douglas L. | Director | 5700 Granite Pkwy. #550, Plano, TX 75024 |
| Cahill, Timothy G. | Director | 715 Kirk Drive, Kansas City, MO 64105 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| O'Grady, Thomas D | Vice President | 6300 Sprint Parkway, Ste. 300, Overland Park, KS 66211 |
| Day, Ted V | Vice President | 9601 McAllister Freeway, 1001 San Antonia, TX 78216 |
| Name | Role | Address |
|---|---|---|
| Lambkin, Bryan C. | Assistant Secretary | 715 KIRK DR, KANSAS CITY, FL 64105 |
| Nielsen, Darren | Assistant Secretary | 715 Kirk Drive, Kansas City, MO 64105 |
| Dennis, Bryan J. | Assistant Secretary | 5700 Granite Pkwy. #550, Plano, TX 75024 |
| Wolf, George | Assistant Secretary | 715 Kirk Drive, Kansas City, MO 64105 |
| Steckler, Scott | Assistant Secretary | 8500 Pena Boulevard, Concourse B, Denver, CO 80249 |
| Pesa, John | Assistant Secretary | 31 St. James Ave., Suite 300, Boston, MA 02116 |
| Tome, David Lopez | Assistant Secretary | 161 N.W. 6th Street, Suite 1000 Miami, FL 33136 |
| Moynihan, Todd | Assistant Secretary | Florida Turnpike Mile Post 263, Bldg. 5315, Ocoee, FL 34761 |
| Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED | 2015-07-07 | 115 North Calhoun St., Suite 4, Tallahassee, FL 32301 | No data |
| REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED | 2012-05-09 | COGENCY GLOBAL INC. | No data |
| CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS | 2003-04-28 | 715 KIRK DRIVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 | No data |
| CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS | 1994-03-29 | 715 KIRK DRIVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 | No data |
| Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINNACLE CONSULTING ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant(s) v. CARLOS ALEJANDRO LILLO, et al., Appellee(s) | 4D2023-1144 | 2023-05-10 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | PINNACLE CONSULTING ENTERPRISES, INC. |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Dwon A. Huggins, Neil P. Robertson, Curtis L. Brown, James Moorhead |
| Name | LEAD ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, LLC |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | William C. Stanford, Melaina Tryon, David S. Johnson, Jordan M. Kirby, Peter R. Restani, Andrew A. Harris |
| Name | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Cerymar Atsioge Lora Valerio |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Hon. Shari Africk-Olefson |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Clerk - Broward |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2024-08-15 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-08-15 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2024-07-25 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Dispensing with Oral Argument |
| Description | ORDERED that Appellant's November 28, 2023 request for oral argument is denied. |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-07-25 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Affirmed |
| Description | Affirmed |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-07-13 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Supplemental Authority |
| Description | Notice of Supplemental Authority |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2024-07-13 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Appellant, Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc.'S, Motion To Strike Appellee's Notice Of Supplemental Authorities, And Motion For Leave To Respond To New Arguments Appellee's Notice Of Supplemental Authorities Raises |
| Docket Date | 2024-07-02 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Supplemental Authority |
| Description | Appellee's Notice of Supplemental Authorities |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2024-04-26 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Reply to Response |
| Description | Appellee's Reply to Appellant's Response to Appellee's Notice of Supplemental Authorities |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-04-16 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Appellant, Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc.'s, Response in Opposition to Appellee's Notice of Supplemental Authorities |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2024-03-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | ORDERED that the appellant's February 28, 2024 motion to strike the appellees' February 18, 2024 notice of supplemental authorities is granted in part and denied in part. Further, ORDERED that the motion to strike is denied insofar as the appellant asks this court to strike the appellees' notice of supplemental authorities but is granted to the extent that the appellant requests leave to file a response. Further, ORDERED that the appellant is directed to respond to the appellees' notice of supplemental authorities within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that the appellees may reply within ten (10) days of service of the response. |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-03-14 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response to Appellant, Pinnacle Consulting Enterprise's Motion to Strike Appellee's Notice of Supplemental Authorities |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2024-02-29 |
| Type | Motions Other |
| Subtype | Motion To Strike |
| Description | Appellant, Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Appellee's Notice of Supplemental Authorities, and Alternatively Seeks Leave to Respond To Arguments Appellee's Notice of Supplemental Authorities Raises |
| Docket Date | 2024-02-19 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Supplemental Authority |
| Description | Notice of Supplemental Authorities |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2024-02-14 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response to Order Dated January 29, 2024 |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2024-02-14 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Withdrawal |
| Description | Appellant, Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc.'s Notice of Withdrawal |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2024-02-09 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response to Order Dated January 29, 2024 |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2024-01-29 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order to File (Supplemental) Appendix |
| Description | ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file a supplemental appendix which contains a transcript of the hearing on the motion to dismiss asserting entitlement to sovereign immunity. |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-12-13 |
| Type | Response |
| Subtype | Response |
| Description | Response to Appellant's Request for Oral Argument |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2023-11-28 |
| Type | Motion |
| Subtype | Request-Oral Argument |
| Description | Request for Oral Argument |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-11-14 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-10-31 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-10-30 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Docket Date | 2023-10-12 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Docket Date | 2023-10-02 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-10-02 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix to Answer Brief |
| Description | Appendix to Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-13 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2023-08-14 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ August 11, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief on or before September 12, 2023. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
| Docket Date | 2023-08-11 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2023-07-17 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellees’ July 14, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellees shall serve the answer brief on or before August 13, 2023. In addition, appellees are notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellees’ right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
| Docket Date | 2023-07-14 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2023-07-14 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Carlos Alejandro Lillo |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-29 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Amicus Curiae Brief |
| Description | Amicus Curiae Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-27 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the American Council of Engineering Companies of Florida’s June 26, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and the amicus brief may be served on or before June 30, 2023. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-26 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-23 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief |
| Description | ORD-Permitting Amicus Curiae Brief ~ ORDERED that the American Council of Engineering Companies of Florida’s June 20, 2023 amended motion to permit filing of an amicus curiae brief is granted, and the amicus brief may be served on or before June 26, 2023. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-20 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Briefs |
| Subtype | Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief |
| Description | Motion To File Amicus Curiae Brief ~ AMENDED |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-15 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Briefs |
| Subtype | Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief |
| Description | Motion To File Amicus Curiae Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-14 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | Appendix to Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-14 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Amended Initial Brief |
| Description | Amended Appellant's Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-12 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Brief on Merits ~ **Stricken** |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-12 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | Appendix to Brief ~ **Stricken** |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-01 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Show Cause |
| Description | Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief/Apdx ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant’s initial brief and appendix have not been filed with this court as of this date pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(e). Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief and appendix are filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order. |
| Docket Date | 2023-05-10 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
| On Behalf Of | Pinnacle Consulting Enterprises, Inc. |
| Docket Date | 2023-05-10 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Docket Date | 2023-05-10 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
| Docket Date | 2023-10-13 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-13 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| View | View File |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-12 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
| Description | Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant’s appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| Docket Date | 2023-05-10 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
| Classification | NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
| Court | 3rd District Court of Appeal |
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County 18-29259 |
Parties
| Name | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Role | Appellant |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | David S. Johnson, Matthew D. Bernstein, Scott W. Anderson |
| Name | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Role | Appellee |
| Status | Active |
| Representations | Joseph A. Zarzaur, Cynthia A. Myers, Maegen Peek Luka, Mark C. Burton, Russell A. Dohan, Hinda Klein, Roderic G. Magie |
| Name | Hon. Jose M. Rodriguez |
| Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
| Status | Active |
| Name | Miami-Dade Clerk |
| Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
| Status | Active |
Docket Entries
| Docket Date | 2023-09-01 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | West Publishing |
| Description | West Publishing |
| Docket Date | 2023-09-01 |
| Type | Mandate |
| Subtype | Mandate |
| Description | Mandate |
| Docket Date | 2023-08-16 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| Description | Attorney Fees Granted (OG47) ~ Upon consideration of Appellant’s Motion for Appellate Attorneys’ Fees, it is ordered that said Motion is granted, contingent upon the trial court’s determination that the offer of judgment complies with Florida law. Appellee’s Motion for Appellate Attorneys’ Fees is hereby denied. |
| Docket Date | 2023-08-16 |
| Type | Disposition by Opinion |
| Subtype | Reversed |
| Description | Reversed - Authored Opinion ~ Reversed and remanded. |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-29 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Supplemental Reply Brief |
| Description | Supplemental Appellant's Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2023-06-09 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order |
| Description | MISCELLANEOUS ORDER (OR999) ~ The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefs within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. Each supplemental brief is limited to no more than ten (10) pages in length and is to specifically discuss application of the language within section 768.28(10)(e), Florida Statutes, which provides: "This paragraph is not applicable to the professional firm or its employees if involved in an accident while operating a motor vehicle. This paragraph is not applicable to a firm engaged by the Department of Transportation for the design or construction of a state roadway, bridge, or other transportation facility construction project or to its employees, agents, or subcontractors." § 768.28(10)(e), Fla. Stat. FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ., concur. |
| Docket Date | 2023-03-06 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
| Description | Order Denying ORAL ARGUMENT ~ Upon consideration, the parties’ Requests for Oral Argument are hereby denied. |
| Docket Date | 2023-01-10 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Reply Brief |
| Description | Appellant's Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2023-01-10 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
| Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
| Description | Request for Oral Argument |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2023-01-10 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
| Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-12-20 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Extension granted to file reply brief NFE (OG05A) ~ Appellant’s Agreed Motion for an Extension of Time to File the Reply Brief is granted to and including January 11, 2023, with no further extensions allowed. |
| Docket Date | 2022-12-19 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-11-17 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ RB-30 days to 12/28/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-11-17 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-11-14 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
| Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
| Description | Motion For Oral Argument ~ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-11-14 |
| Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
| Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-10-26 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Answer Brief |
| Description | Appellee's Answer Brief ~ ANSWER BRIEF OF CAITLIN MILSTEAD, as PersonalRepresentative of the ESTATE OF ZACHARY STINSON |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-10-26 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE, CAITLIN MILSTEAD, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ZACHARY STINSON, |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-10-12 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Extension granted to file answer brief NFE (OG04A) ~ Appellee’s Agreed Notice of Extension of Time to file the answer brief is treated as a motion for extension of time to file the answer brief, and the motion is granted to and including October 26, 2022, with no further extensions allowed. If said brief is not timely filed in accordance with this Order, the appellee(s) will be precluded from filing an answer brief and/or presenting oral argument to the Court in this cause. |
| Docket Date | 2022-10-07 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-23 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
| Description | Extension granted to file answer brief (OG04) ~ Appellee’s Agreed Notice of Extension of Time to file answer brief is treated as an agreed motion for extension of time to file the answer brief, and the motion is granted to and including October 10, 2022. |
| Docket Date | 2022-09-21 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-23 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ AB-30 days to 9/26/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-08-22 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-07-22 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| Description | Notice of Agreed Extension of Time |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-07-22 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ AB-30 days to 8/26/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-07-05 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-06-27 |
| Type | Brief |
| Subtype | Initial Brief |
| Description | Initial Brief on Merits |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-06-27 |
| Type | Record |
| Subtype | Appendix |
| Description | Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT, HNTB CORPORATION |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-06-13 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ IB-10 days to 6/27/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-06-13 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIALBRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-26 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ IB-15 days to 6/15/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-26 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
| Description | Notice of Appearance |
| On Behalf Of | CAITLIN MILSTEAD |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-26 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-11 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ IB-15 days to 5/30/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-10 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
| Description | Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ IB-15 days to 5/28/2022 |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-10 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Related Case or Issue |
| Description | Notice of Similar or Related Case |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-10 |
| Type | Motions Extensions |
| Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
| Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIALBRIEF |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-05-02 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal |
| Description | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-04-29 |
| Type | Notice |
| Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
| Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ HNTB CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF APPEAL OF NON-FINAL ORDERRELATED CASE: 19-15 |
| On Behalf Of | HNTB CORPORATION |
| Docket Date | 2022-04-29 |
| Type | Order |
| Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
| Description | Order to pay filing fee-civil w/atty (OR14B) ~ This is to notify counsel for Appellant that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this appeal will be dismissed unless the required three hundred dollar ($300.00) fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before May 9, 2022. |
| Docket Date | 2022-04-29 |
| Type | Misc. Events |
| Subtype | Fee Status |
| Description | FP:Fee Paid Through Portal |
| Docket Date | 2022-04-29 |
| Type | Letter |
| Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
| Description | Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case letter with attachments. The 3DCA $300 filing fee for a notice of appeal is due. |
| Name | Date |
|---|---|
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2025-01-02 |
| AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-09-10 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2024-01-03 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2023-01-04 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2022-01-04 |
| AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-06-03 |
| AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-05-03 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2021-01-05 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2020-01-03 |
| ANNUAL REPORT | 2019-04-02 |
Date of last update: 03 Feb 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State
