| Docket Date |
2021-06-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Luz Patricia Vallejo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-08
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that the appellant's March 4, 2022 motion for rehearing, and in the alternative, motion for written opinion and certification of conflict is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RESHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Luz Patricia Vallejo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-04
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-17
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Grant Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 12, 2022 “motion to consider reply brief waived and proceed to conference upon initial brief and answer brief” is granted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO CONSIDER REPLY BRIEF WAIVED AND PROCEED TO CONFERENCE UPON INITIAL BRIEF AND ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 10, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Luz Patricia Vallejo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-13
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 2, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-02
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that upon consideration of appellant’s response filed July 29, 2021, this court’s July 23, 2021 order to show cause is discharged. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s July 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Objection
|
| Description |
Objection
|
| On Behalf Of |
Luz Patricia Vallejo
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ **DISCHARGED**ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 564 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 11, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-06
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-05
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-05
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Ernesto Lopez
|
|
