| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2017-09-06
|
| Emphasis |
N: LEAD, P: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2018-04-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
1901.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a. On or about September 6, 2017, one employee dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust, and changing filters in the shooting range rooms was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.085 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 1.69 times. The air sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one work-shift. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 E03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: a. On or about September 6, 2017, one employee was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust, and changing filters in the shooting range rooms was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.085 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 1.69 times. The air sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one work-shift. The employer did not establish a written compliance program outlining specific engineering controls to be implemented to reduce employee lead exposures to below the Permissible Exposure Level (PEL). The written plan should include at least the requirements set forth in sections 1910.1025(e) (3)(ii)(A)-(H). |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. On or about August 30, 2017, employees were required to wear a half face air purifying respirator (North model 5500-30L with North P100 cartridges) during the gun range clean-up activities such as but not limited to, dry-vacuuming lead dust and changing of filters at the shooting range rooms. The employer had not established nor implemented a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a. On or about September 6, 2017, one employee was assigned duties to including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the Shooting Range Rooms was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.085 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the Action Level (AL) of 0.03 mg/m3 by approximately 2.83 times. The air sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one work-shift. The employer did not make an initial determination regarding employee's exposure to lead while cleaning the dust in the shooting range rooms to determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 I02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
815.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1630.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: a. On or about September 6, 2017, one employee dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust and changing filters in the shooting range rooms was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.085 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 1.69 times. The air sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one work-shift. The employer did not provide a clean change room for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL). |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: a. On or about September 6, 2017, one employee dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust, and changing filters in the shooting range rooms was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.085 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the OSHA Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 by approximately 1.69 times. The air sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one work-shift. The employer did not assure that the employee with exposures to airborne lead concentrations exceeding the Permissible Exposure Level (PELs) showered at the end of the work shift. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
1358.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
2717.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a. On or about September 6, 2017, one employee who was assigned duties including but not limited to clean-up activities, such as dry-vacuuming, dry-sweeping ammunition dust, and changing filters in the shooting range rooms was exposed to airborne lead concentration of 0.085 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) which exceeded the Action Level (AL) of 0.03 mg/m3 by approximately 2.83 times. The air sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one work-shift. The employer did not inform the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025 regulation for employees who had potential exposure to airborne lead. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-04 |
| Current Penalty |
1629.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
3259.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a. On or about August 30, 2017, the employer did not assure that surfaces including, but not limited to, door handles, power tools, classroom table tops, and appliances were maintained as free as practicable of lead accumulations. Bullseye Indoor Gun Range, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard CFR 29, 1910.1025(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 893333, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on September 10, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 6041 Atlantic Boulevard Jacksonville, FL 32211. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about September 6, 2017, the employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees working with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to lead, bleach, De-lead wipe, and Windex. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 G08 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: a. On or about September 6, 2017, the employer did not maintain the copies of the required safety data sheets for materials such as but not limit lead, bleach, De-lead wipe, and Windex. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H03 IV |
| Issuance Date |
2017-12-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-01-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a. On or about September 6, 2017, the employer did not provide the information and training on the new label elements and the new safety data sheet format to employees who had exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to lead, bleach, De-lead wipe, and Windex. |
|
|
