| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502022CA000107
|
Parties
| Name |
VINYASUN CORPORATION
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Stephen E. Walker
|
|
| Name |
Gregory Osbourne
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Nicole Quattrocchi
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Richard Oftedal
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-09-05
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s August 17, 2023 motion to dismiss is denied as moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-05
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
Gregory Osbourne
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant’s initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s June 20, 2023 jurisdictional brief and appellee’s June 30, 2023 response, this appeal is dismissed only as to the portion of the May 1, 2023 order awarding entitlement to attorney’s fees but reserving ruling on the amount. See S.-Owners Ins. Co. v. Logsdon, 75 So. 3d 1270, 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (dismissing portion of appeal regarding award of attorney’s fees as the order granting entitlement to fees was not appealable) (citing Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)). This appeal shall proceed as to the remainder of the May 1, 2023 order.GROSS, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Gregory Osbourne
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Gregory Osbourne
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-20
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinyasun Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-31
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinyasun Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-09
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vinyasun Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the portion of the May 1, 2023 order awarding attorney’s fees is appealable, as it reserves ruling on the amount. See S.-Owners Ins. Co. v. Logsdon, 75 So. 3d 1270, 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (dismissing portion of appeal regarding award of attorney’s fees as the order granting entitlement to fees was not appealable) (citing Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
Appellant to File Order Appealed-Civil ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order being appealed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d). This copy must contain a legible stamp from the clerk of the lower tribunal, showing the date and time the order being appealed was filed in that office.
|
|
|
