| Docket Date |
2022-05-13
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-21
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Offer Judg. ~ ORDERED that appellee 94-18 Roosevelt Ave., Corp.’s December 8, 2021 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellee is entitled to fees under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2021), and if so, setting the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-09
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-08
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 6, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within five (5) days from the current due date. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-06
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that the appellee’s November 10, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the proposed supplemental record is accepted and deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-10
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-08
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ 94-18 ROOSEVELT AVE., CORP.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee 94-18 Roosevelt Ave., Corp.’s October 26, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ 94-18 Roosevelt Ave., Corp.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 10/27/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 94-18 Roosevelt Ave., Corp.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-03
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellee's Answer Brief ~ NARDIN WORLDWIDE GROUP, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellee’s August 27, 2021 answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-27
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 94-18 Roosevelt Ave., Corp.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 09/27/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 08/27/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellee’s July 23, 2021 notice of agreed extension of time to file answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee’s July 23, 2021 notice of agreed extension to file answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s July 23, 2021 notice of agreed extension to file answer brief is also stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ 94-18 Roosevelt Ave., Corp.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 08/27/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-28
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 23, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within five (5) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s May 18, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-18
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant’s April 19, 2021 notice of filing is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s April 19, 2021 notice of filing is also stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Order Granting Relinquishment of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 12, 2021 motion to relinquish jurisdiction is granted. See McNulty v. BankUnited, 140 So. 3d 1041, 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (courts grant motions to relinquish sparingly and usually for the accomplishment of ministerial matters); Churruca v. Miami Jai--Alai, Inc., 271 So. 2d 818, 820 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) (relinquishing jurisdiction to allow the circuit court to amend its order requiring resident plaintiffs to post cost bonds where the appellant argued that the circuit court only intended to order non-resident plaintiffs to post cost bonds). Jurisdiction is relinquished to the trial court for thirty (30) days for the purpose of ruling on appellant’s Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 motion.The appellant shall forward to this court a copy of any order issued during relinquishment. It is further ordered that the appellant shall monitor this proceeding in the trial court. If further time is needed beyond this relinquishment period, it shall be the duty of appellant to request an extension of time by proper motion to this court. This case shall proceed in this court upon expiration of relinquishment unless otherwise notified in writing by the parties. Appellant shall file the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the expiration of relinquishment.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction ~ and/or UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 8, 2021 amended motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the material requested in the motion. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-08
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-deny motion to supplement per 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 5, 2021 motion to supplement the record is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court’s Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraph 1.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-05
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-deny motion to supplement per 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 3, 2021 motion to supplement the record is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court’s Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraph 1.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee’s February 26, 2021 notice of appearance is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s February 26, 2021 notice of appearance is also stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-02-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-19
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 2,770 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-12
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 12, 2021 status report is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 11, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on December 22, 2020, appellant is ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on November 12, 2020, appellant is ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nardin Worldwide Group, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF DISPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 4, 2020 notice of disposition of plaintiff’s motion for rehearing is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF DISPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order to File Status Report ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a status report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, regarding the progress being made toward the disposition of the pending motion in the trial court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-12
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-16
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Charles Taffe
|
|
