| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2017-03-21
|
| Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2017-08-23
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1219092 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1191172 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-02 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-08-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: (a) For employees using a pressure washer for the outside of the building, as noted on or about 03/21/2017, employees were offered the 3M, N95, Particulate Respirator, without having been provided the Appendix D information. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-11-30
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1159866 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
4 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph. a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold whose height to base width ration exceeded 4:1 was restrained. Employees were working on a scaffolding that was over 50 foot in height and was improperly restrained from tipping with improperly installed anchors. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 C03 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. Employees were working on a scaffolding that was not braced properly. The scaffold frames on the fifth and sixth levels were bent and the cross bracing was not connected at multiple locations throughout the scaffolding. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 C02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
5 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): All brace connections were not secured. a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. The employer did not ensure all the cross braces were attached to the erected scaffolding uprights. There were multiple cross bracing that was not connected to the uprights. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. The employer failed to ensure that the components of the scaffolding were inspected. The scaffold frames located at the fifth and sixth tier were visibly bent. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F07 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold from that employees were required to work was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. The employees working from the metal frame scaffold were not protected from fall hazard. The scaffolding ends were missing guardrails. Employees were exposed to a 11 feet 5 inches fall. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 B |
| Issuance Date |
2017-03-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-17 |
| Current Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-03-22 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work: a) For employees working at 2309 Angel Oliva Senior Street in Tampa, as observed on or about November 30, 2016. The employer failed to ensure that each employee involved in erecting the scaffold was trained by a competent person. the scaffold was erected with bent frame uprights, improper tie in anchors and missing cross braces and guardrails. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19030019 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-03-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-09 |
| Current Penalty |
311.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
311.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-05-08 |
| Nr Instances |
7 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) The employer failed to submit the abatement verification documentaion along with the abatement certification. The case was final order on October 19, 2017. |
|
|
