| Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellants’ March 18, 2022 notice of filing, this court finds that appellants are still not in compliance with this court’s December 10, 2021 order and sua sponte grants appellants an additional thirty (30) days to comply with the order. Appellants need to obtain an order dismissing the underlying action or complaint. See Paulino v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 106 So. 3d 985, 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“On the other hand, it is well-established that an order which merely grants a motion to dismiss, as contrasted with an order dismissing a complaint or an action, is not a final order.”). Appellants may need to file a motion with the trial court in order to obtain this order. Failure to comply may result in dismissal or other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that upon consideration of appellants’ response filed February 11, 2022, this court’s January 19, 2022 order to show cause is discharged. Further, ORDERED that appellants’ February 11, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to comply with this Court’s December 10, 2021 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-11
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ AMENDED - AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-09
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Moot ~ ORDERED that appellee’s September 22, 2022 motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied as moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-23
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nettles Island, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nettles Island, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-01
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
| Description |
ORD-Reinstatement ~ ORDERED that appellants’ August 5, 2022 motion to set aside the July 29, 2022 dismissal order and their request for an extension of time to serve the initial brief is granted and the appeal is reinstated. Further, ORDERED that appellants’ shall serve the initial brief within 30 days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nettles Island, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-05
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
| Description |
Motion For Reinstatement ~ and Motion for Extension of Time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-29
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-29
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk ~ (Reinstated 8/29/22)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants in the above-styled case are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellants’ initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ AMENDED ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME **Stricken**
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ **DISCHARGED**ORDERED that appellants are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court's December 10, 2021 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Order
|
| Description |
ORD-FROM CIRCUIT COURT/AGENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nettles Island, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
Aplnt to file underlying order being appealed ~ The Notice of Appeal seeks an appeal of the order denying a motion for rehearing. An order denying a motion for rehearing is not independently appealable. Within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellants shall submit a conformed copy of the underlying order which is the subject of the motion for rehearing for the purpose of determining whether the filing of the motion for rehearing tolled the jurisdictional time limit of the filing of the Notice of Appeal of the underlying order from which appellant seeks review.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-30
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ *Certified Copy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
George Voigt
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-26
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellants’ January 28, 2022 response to order to show cause including a motion for extension of time is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Aplnt to Obtain Final Order-Per Dobrick ~ It appearing that the order to which the Notice of Appeal is directed is a non-appealable, non-final order, appellants shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to obtain a final order and to file a copy in this court. Failure to do so will result in sua sponte dismissal of the appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l); Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Paulino v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 106 So. 3d 985, 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“On the other hand, it is well-established that an order which merely grants a motion to dismiss, as contrasted with an order dismissing a complaint or an action, is not a final order.”). ORDERED that the trial court is specifically authorized, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(b), upon appropriate application, to enter a final order in these proceedings.
|
|
