|
347895252
|
0418800
|
2024-11-15
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, HIALEAH, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2024-11-15
|
| Emphasis |
N: AMPUTATE, P: AMPUTATE
|
|
|
341725299
|
0418800
|
2016-08-25
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, HIALEAH, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2016-08-25
|
| Emphasis |
L: HINOISE, P: HINOISE
|
| Case Closed |
2016-12-13
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19100133 A03 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-09-30 |
| Current Penalty |
2993.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
4276.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-10-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses. On or about August 25th, 2016, at the jobsite located at 7590 W 19th Ct. Hialeah, FL 33014, the employer did not ensure that employees use safety glasses that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses to avoid flying metals part that maybe produced during the rivets manufacturing. The employer, Universal Rivet, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 978096, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 22nd, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 7590 W 19th Ct. Hialeah, FL 33014. |
|
|
|
339796922
|
0418800
|
2014-05-30
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, HIALEAH, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-05-30
|
| Emphasis |
N: AMPUTATE
|
| Case Closed |
2014-10-28
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
891159 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
978096 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
2940.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-28 |
| Nr Instances |
9 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Instances: a. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 National Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. b. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 National Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. c. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 National Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. d. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 National Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. e. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 Carlos Salvi Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. f. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 1/4 Carlos Salvi Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. g. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 1/4 Carlos Salvi Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. h. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 double dye National Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. i. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 3/16 double dye National Header machine that had not been provided with a guard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-28 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(b)(1): Flywheel(s) with parts seven feet or less above floor(s) or platform(s) were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iv)(a): a. On or about May 30th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, in the header area, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while working with a 1/4 Carlo Salvi Header machine that did not have guards in place on the flywheel. |
|
|
|
339780967
|
0418800
|
2014-05-22
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, HIALEAH, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2014-06-10
|
| Case Closed |
2014-08-22
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
889301 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
890739 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
979692 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100133 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-08-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-29 |
| Current Penalty |
840.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-08-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from liquid chemicals while working with those hazards: On or about May 22nd 2014, at the above jobsite, the employer did not ensure that employees use safety glasses or goggles while using the Stoddard solvent. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-08-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-08-22 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
13 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 119.4% dose or an equivalent sound level of 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 494 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 106 minutes. b. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 151.1% dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 503 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 97 minutes. c. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 134.5 % dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 502 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 98 minutes. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-08-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-08-22 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
13 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): A representative monitoring program was not developed and implemented when information indicated that an employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA: a. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not developed a representative monitoring program for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 119.4% dose or an equivalent sound level of 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 494 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 106 minutes. b. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not developed a representative monitoring program for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 151.1% dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 503 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 97 minutes. c. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not developed a representative monitoring program for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 134.5 % dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 502 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 98 minutes. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 G05 I |
| Issuance Date |
2014-08-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-08-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
13 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program with a baseline audiogram for employees who were exposed to noise levels up to 151.1 % dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.9 dBA. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001D |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 G06 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-08-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-08-22 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
13 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels : a. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program with annual audiograms for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 119.4% dose or an equivalent sound level of 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 494 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 106 minutes. b. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program with annual audiograms for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 151.1% dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 503 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 97 minutes. c. On or about June 6th, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not implement an effective hearing conservation program with annual audiograms for employees who were exposed to noise levels of 134.5 % dose or an equivalent sound level of 92.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 502 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled time of 98 minutes. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2014-08-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-08-29 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-08-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: On or about May 22nd, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide the information contained in the appendix D to employees using a filtering face piece respirator while performing cleaning operations with Stoddard solvent. |
|
|
|
101163111
|
0418800
|
1987-02-09
|
7590 WEST 19 COURT, HIALEAH, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
1987-02-09
|
| Case Closed |
1987-03-24
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
1987-02-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1987-03-31 |
| Current Penalty |
60.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
120.0 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100215 B09 |
| Issuance Date |
1987-02-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1987-03-11 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 A01 I |
| Issuance Date |
1987-02-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1987-03-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 B02 |
| Issuance Date |
1987-02-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1987-03-11 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
|
| Citation ID |
02004 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100305 G01 III |
| Issuance Date |
1987-02-26 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1987-03-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
|
|
|
13328331
|
0418800
|
1981-11-13
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, Hialeah, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
FollowUp
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
1981-11-13
|
| Case Closed |
1981-11-20
|
|
|
13327960
|
0418800
|
1980-09-12
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, Hialeah, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
1980-10-17
|
| Case Closed |
1981-11-20
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
909056673 |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
1981-03-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1981-11-09 |
| Current Penalty |
100.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
100.0 |
| Nr Instances |
6 |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 B03 |
| Issuance Date |
1980-11-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1981-01-05 |
| Nr Instances |
6 |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100106 D02 I |
| Issuance Date |
1980-11-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1980-11-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
|
|
|
13380704
|
0418800
|
1980-01-04
|
7590 W 19TH COURT, Hialeah, FL, 33014
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
1980-01-04
|
| Case Closed |
1980-04-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040002 A |
| Issuance Date |
1980-01-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1980-01-19 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
1980-01-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
1980-01-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
|
|
