Docket Date |
2017-11-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant's October 27, 2017 "motion for acceptance of appellants affidavit in response to courts latest orders and an affidavit in support of affidants request for reopening the case for good cause" is treated as both a motion for reinstatement and motion for extension of time to file the initial brief and are denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-10-27
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR ACCEPTANCE OF AFFIDAVIT IN RESPONSE TO COURTS LATEST ORDERS AND AN AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR REOPENING THE CASE FOR GOOD CAUSE
|
On Behalf Of |
JOHN R. NARDOLILLI
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-10-18
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-10-18
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause
|
Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before October 9, 2017, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 29, 2017 "motion for referral to volunteer attorney program" is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Objection
|
Description |
Objection ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
American Express Centurion Bank
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-18
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS
|
On Behalf Of |
American Express Centurion Bank
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 9, 2017 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before September 19, 2017. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-06-29
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
JOHN R. NARDOLILLI
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-06-29
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR REFERRAL TO VOLUNTEER ATTORNEY PROGRAM
|
On Behalf Of |
JOHN R. NARDOLILLI
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-06-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal shall proceed as to the default final judgment entered March 21, 2017 pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-05-25
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ 1085 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-05-04
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Order Appealed
|
Description |
Order Appealed ~ (DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT)
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-04-27
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
Description |
ORD-Discharging Show Cause ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's April 18, 2017 response, this court's April 13, 2017 order to show cause is discharged; further, ORDERED that appellant's April 18, 2017 "motion for extension of time to file the initial brief" is treated as a "motion for extension of time to comply with this court's March 21, 2017 order" and is granted. The appellant shall file a response to this court's March 21, 2017 order within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-04-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause ~ *AND* MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.
|
On Behalf Of |
JOHN R. NARDOLILLI
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-04-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ **OTSC DISCHARGED 4/27/17**ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court's March 21, 2017 order requiring a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case to be filed with this court. If this brief jurisdictional statement is filed within this ten (10) day period, this order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-03-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ DUPLICATE COPY OF NOA AND DETERMINATION OF INDIGENT STATUS
|
On Behalf Of |
JOHN R. NARDOLILLI
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-03-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the order granting plaintiff's motion for judicial default is an appealable order. Westwood One, Inc. v. Flight Express, Inc., 940 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (trial court's order granting motion for default was nonfinal and nonappealable); furtherAppellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-03-21
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-03-20
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
|
Description |
Determination of Indigent Status
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-03-20
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
JOHN R. NARDOLILLI
|
|