|
SCOTT ROBERTS VS JENNIFER STEINLAUF, et al.
|
4D2023-1511
|
2023-06-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE19-015443
|
Parties
| Name |
Scott Roberts
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Evan B. Berger
|
|
| Name |
K. & G. JEWELRY, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Karen Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Freddy's Certified Diamonds & Fine Jewelry
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Kathleen S. Phang, Jonathan Feldman
|
|
| Name |
William Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Carol-Lisa Phillips
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-08-09
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-09
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. ~ ORDERED that the June 21, 2023 petition for writ of prohibition is denied.KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Prohibition
|
| Description |
Petition Prohibition ~ Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
|
|
SCOTT ROBERTS and BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A. VS JENNIFER STEINLAUF, et al.
|
4D2022-2789
|
2022-10-14
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE19015443
|
Parties
| Name |
BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Scott Roberts
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Lilliana M. Farinas-Sabogal, Evan B. Berger
|
|
| Name |
Freddy's Certified Diamonds & Fine Jewelry
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
K. & G. JEWELRY, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
W. Aaron Daniel, Elliot B. Kula, Kathleen S. Phang, William D. Mueller, Jonathan Feldman
|
|
| Name |
Karen Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
William Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Marcy Fertel
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Carol-Lisa Phillips
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-12-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Deny Attorney's Fees ~ Upon consideration of appellants’ November 9, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellees’ November 2, 2022 motion for appellate attorney’s fees is denied. See Garcia v. Collazo, 178 So. 3d 429, 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ("A party seeking attorney's fees in an appellate court must provide substance and specify the particular contractual, statutory, or other substantive basis for an award of fees on appeal.") (citing United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Phillips, 775 So. 2d 921, 922 (Fla. 2000) (“It is simply insufficient for parties to only refer to rule 9.400 or to rely on another court's order in support of a motion for attorney's fees for services rendered in an appellate court.”)).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-18
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-18
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissal ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellants’ October 25, 2022 jurisdictional brief and appellees’ November 2, 2022 response, this appeal is dismissed as premature. See Alexopoulos v. Gordon Hargrove & James, P.A., 109 So. 3d 248, 250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“An order merely finding entitlement to attorneys’ fees is a nonfinal, non-appealable order.”).WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-09
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO STATEMENT OF BASIS FOR JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-02
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellants shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellants shall specifically address how the September 16, 2022 order is an appealable final or nonfinal order, as it appears the order grants the motion for sanctions without awarding an amount of attorney's fees. See Johnson Tr. of Irrevocable Tr. No. 7 v. Cliché Piano Bar & Pool Lounge, LLC, 290 So. 3d 158, 159 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (finding portion of an order granting a section 57.105 motion for attorney's fees to be nonappealable, as it did not award an amount of fees). Further,Appellees may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-14
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
|
|
SCOTT ROBERTS VS JENNIFER STEINLAUF, et al.
|
4D2021-3488
|
2021-12-10
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE19-015443
|
Parties
| Name |
Scott Roberts
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Evan B. Berger
|
|
| Name |
K. & G. JEWELRY, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
William Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Marcy Fertel
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Karen Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Kathleen S. Phang, W. Aaron Daniel, William D. Mueller, Elliot B. Kula
|
|
| Name |
Freddy's Certified Diamonds and Fine Jewelry
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Carol-Lisa Phillips
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-02-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 2, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for service of the initial brief is extended to and including April 1, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ITS INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 1,437 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
ORD-Granting Consolidation ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 31, 2022 unopposed motion to consolidate is granted, and the above-styled case numbers are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2739. Appellant shall file a single brief addressing the issues in both cases. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s January 31, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted and the time for service of the initial brief is extended to and including March 2, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
| Description |
ORD-Reinstatement ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 24, 2022 motion for reinstatement is granted, and the above-styled appeal is reinstated.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-24
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-24
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
| Description |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-24
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-24
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-No Filing Fee ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for non-payment of the $300.00 filing fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Aplnt to Obtain Final Order-Dobrick/BCH ~ It appearing that the order to which the Notice of Appeal is directed is a non-appealable, non-final order, appellant(s) shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to obtain a final order and to file a copy in this court. Failure to do so will result in sua sponte dismissal of the appeal. Dobrick v. Discovery Cruises, Inc., 581 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also Rust v. Brown, 13 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("An order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party.").ORDERED that the trial court is specifically authorized, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(b), upon appropriate application, to enter a final order in these proceedings.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-10
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
|
|
SCOTT ROBERTS VS JENNIFER STEINLAUF, et al.
|
4D2021-2739
|
2021-09-22
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE19-015443
|
Parties
| Name |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
William D. Mueller, Kathleen S. Phang, Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel
|
|
| Name |
Karen Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
William Steinlauf
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Freddy's Certified Diamonds and Fine Jewelry
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Marcy Fertel
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Carol-Lisa Phillips
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Scott Roberts
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Evan B. Berger
|
|
| Name |
K. & G. JEWELRY, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the April 1, 2022 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ITS INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 1,437 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
ORD-Granting Consolidation ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 31, 2022 unopposed motion to consolidate is granted, and the above-styled case numbers are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2739. Appellant shall file a single brief addressing the issues in both cases. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s January 31, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted and the time for service of the initial brief is extended to and including March 2, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 10, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before January 29, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-10
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Steinlauf
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Order denying EOT w/out prejudice 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraphs 1 and 2.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-29
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before December 29, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 1,329 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-29
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 22, 2021 status report is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Status Report
|
| Description |
Status Report ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
| Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on November 10, 2021, it is ORDERED that appellant shall file a report, within five (5) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment for the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-27
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-23
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Scott Roberts
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 2, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time for service of the initial brief is extended to and including April 1, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
