|
343477642
|
0420600
|
2018-09-20
|
4523 CULBREATH AVE, TAMPA, FL, 33609
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2018-09-20
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2019-03-25
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Current Penalty |
2387.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4774.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-03-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: a. At the east side of the building, employees were exposed to an 18 foot fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not used while on a ladder jack scaffold which was used to gain access to the exterior of the building and to the roof of the building, on or about 09/20/2018. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-02-04 |
| Current Penalty |
2387.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4774.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-03-01 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: a. At the roof of the building, an employee was exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not used during roofing work on a flat roof, on or about 09/20/2018. b. At the roof of the garage, an employee was exposed to a 10 foot fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not used during roofing work on a flat roof, on or about 09/20/2018. |
|
|
|
342457082
|
0420600
|
2017-07-10
|
DOMINO'S PIZZA BAKERY STORE 1410 PINEHURST RD., DUNEDIN, FL, 34698
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Fat/Cat
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-07-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-12-20
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1237077 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Accident |
| Activity Nr |
1238643 |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1245726 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19040039 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-11-20 |
| Current Penalty |
3802.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
6338.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-12-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours. a) On or about 06/30/2017 at 1410 Pinehurst Drive in Dunedin, Florida, an employee fell from a roof causing trauma to the head and torso and was hospitalized. The employer was aware of the in-patient hospitalization on Friday, 6/30/17. The employer notified OSHA on 7/5/2017 at 5:02 pm of the in-patient hospitalization. |
|
|
|
340890169
|
0420600
|
2015-08-31
|
3002 AQUILLA STREET, TAMPA, FL, 33629
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
NoInspection
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-08-31
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2015-08-31
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1014149 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
338922214
|
0420600
|
2013-02-28
|
3120 W. EUCLID AVE., TAMPA, FL, 33629
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-02-28
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-05-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-01 |
| Current Penalty |
2940.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-04-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) At the jobsite - employees were exposed to a 21 foot fall hazard, in that, the use of fall protection was not enforced while working from a 6 in 12 pitched roof. Violation observed on or about 2/28/2013. |
|
|
|
338723430
|
0420600
|
2013-02-04
|
4716 W SAN RAFAEL ST, TAMPA, FL, 33611
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2013-02-04
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-05-16
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-05-03 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-05-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. (a) On the roof employee(s) using a pneumatic nail gun to nail down decking were exposed to eye injuries in that the nail gun operator was not wearing personal protective equipment such as but not limited to safety glasses. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260416 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-05-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-05-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: (a) At site employees working within 2' 8" of a 120 volt power line are exposed to electrocution hazard. Employees were removing tiles from a 4/12 pitch roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-05-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4900.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-05-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
15 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest system. (a) Employees removing shingles from the roof without fall protection are exposed to a 13.5 foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260059 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-05-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-05-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.59: An employer engaged in construction activities did not comply with the requirements set forth in Part 1910, Section 1200(h), Hazard Communication: (a) Employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, such as but not limited to MSDS location, intepretation and purpose of MSDS. |
|
|
