| Docket Date |
2019-08-27
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
File Destroyed
|
| Description |
FILE DESTROYED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-01-23
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
**DISP-REHEARING
|
| Description |
DISP-REHEARING DY ~ Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing, filed June 12, 2013, is hereby denied. (RC)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-23
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Record Center
|
| Description |
RECORD CENTER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-12
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Rehearing
|
| Description |
MOTION-REHEARING ~ (RC)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nasra M. Arafat-Ibrahim
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-29
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Mandamus Deny
|
| Description |
DISP-MANDAMUS DY ~ Petitioner has submitted a "Petition for Writ of Mandamus From Appellate Court Fourth District." Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, she is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-01-08
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Proper Petition
|
| Description |
PROPER PETITION ~ FILED AS "PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM APPELLATE COURT FOURTH DISTRICT" (CERTIFIED COPY)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nasra M. Arafat-Ibrahim
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-01-02
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Proper Petition
|
| Description |
PROPER PETITION ~ FILED AS "PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM APPELLATE COURT FOURTH DISTRICT" (O&7)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nasra M. Arafat-Ibrahim
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-12-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Proper Petition
|
| Description |
ORDER-PROPER PETITION ~ Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, filed in this Court on November 19, 2012, has been treated as a petition for writ of mandamus seeking reinstatement of the proceedings in the district court of appeal below. Petitioner is allowed to and including January 3, 2013, in which to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus; that complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, addressing why the proceedings in the district court of appeal should not have been dismissed. The failure to file a proper petition with this Court within the time provided could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it may not be subject to reinstatement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-12-14
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
No Fee - Insolvent
|
| Description |
No Fee - Insolvent ~ INSOLVENT BELOW
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-12-14
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-11-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
NI:No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
| Docket Date |
2012-11-19
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
PETITION-MANDAMUS ~ FILED AS NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION & TREATED AS PET-MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nasra M. Arafat-Ibrahim
|
|
