Docket Date |
2020-10-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant’s October 12, 2020 status report is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Mandate
|
Description |
Supreme Court Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-09
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
Description |
SC2022-0597 Supreme Court Opinion Remanded
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-03-16
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
Description |
Misc. Supreme Court Order ~ SC22-597
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
Description |
Misc. Supreme Court Order ~ SC22-0597
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-09
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
Description |
Misc. Supreme Court Order ~ SC22-597 SC ACCEPTS JURISDICTION
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-03
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
Description |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC22-597
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-29
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
Description |
Notice of Discretionary Jurisdiction to Supreme Court
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-29
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice
|
Description |
Notice sent to the Supreme Court
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-22
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-22
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-30
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part
|
Description |
Affirmed in Part/Reversed in Part - Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Oral Argument Date Set
|
Description |
Oral Argument Date Set ~ 4DCA
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Re: Video Oral Argument
|
Description |
Order Re: Video Oral Argument ~ ORDERED due to the increase in COVID cases caused by the Omicron variant, that the court sua sponte gives notice that within seven (7) days from the date of this order, either side may file a motion for remote oral argument, which, if granted, would take place on the same week as the currently scheduled in-person oral argument, with the date and time to be set by further order of this court. Before filing the motion, the moving party shall confer with the opposing side to ascertain whether the opposing side agrees to a remote oral argument. The motion shall state: (1) the request is made due to concerns about the pandemic (no further details are needed); and (2) whether the opposing side consents to a remote oral argument. If the motion is opposed, then the opposing side shall file a response to the motion within three (3) days after the filing of the motion. No extensions of time to file the motion or response will be permitted, absent extraordinary circumstances. If the court grants the motion for remote oral argument, the argument will take place via Zoom video conference and all judges and attorneys will appear remotely.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 5, 2021 notice of agreed extension is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-05
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-11-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 60 DAYS TO 01/05/2021
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-11-06
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-26
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-21
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ 2,323 PAGES
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
ORD-Setting Oral Argument ~ This case is set for Oral Argument on February 8, 2022, at 9:30 A.M. for 15 minutes per side, in person at the Fourth District Court of Appeal Courthouse. If a side anticipates more than two attorneys sitting at counsel table during oral argument, it shall contact the Marshal’s Office by phone at least two business days before the oral argument session. The court calendars can be viewed on this court's website at www.4dca.org. In criminal cases where a victim, as defined in Article I, Section 16(e) of the Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under Article I, Section 16(b)(6) of the Florida Constitution, the State shall provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date or time.Within seven (7) days from the date of this order, either side may file a motion for remote oral argument, which, if granted, would take place on the same week as the currently scheduled in-person oral argument, with the date and time to be set by further order of this court. Before filing the motion, the moving party shall confer with the opposing side to ascertain whether the opposing side agrees to a remote oral argument. The motion shall state: (1) the reasons why remote oral argument is requested; and (2) whether the opposing side consents to a remote oral argument. If the motion is opposed, then the opposing side shall file a response to the motion within three (3) days after the filing of the motion. No extensions of time to file the motion or response will be permitted, absent extraordinary circumstances. If the court grants the motion for remote oral argument, the argument will take place via Zoom video conference and all judges and attorneys will appear remotely.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-17
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-30
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 15 DAYS TO 08/17/2021
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-30
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Reply Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-01
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-05-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 07/01/2021
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-05-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 60 DAYS TO 05/30/2021
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-29
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-02
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-02
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
Description |
Supplemental Records
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
Description |
ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that appellant’s March 2, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the material requested in the motion. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-03-02
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 29, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before March 1, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ CORRECTED
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-29
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Bennet Auto Supply
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee Melanie Chung-Tims Esq.’s January 28, 2021 notice of appearance is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s notice of appearance is also stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-27
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant’s January 26, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within seven (7) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-26
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-08
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 02/04/2021
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-01-08
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-12
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Status Report
|
Description |
Status Report
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-10-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on September 24, 2020, appellant is ordered to file a report, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the payment and preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-24
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Affidavit
|
Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-03
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-03
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-03
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-08-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
Jennifer Ripple
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-08-28
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|